Legal Issues the Tech Sector Shouldn't Forget During a Global Viral Outbreak
While many technology companies are forging on, it is certainly not business as usual for most. Here are a few key considerations that are unique to the technology sector that bear remembering.
April 09, 2020 at 07:00 AM
7 minute read
As the world faces the challenges of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the technology sector has provided essential support to people, businesses and communities as they adapt to changing circumstances. From supporting remote workforces around the world, to operating the backbone of global digital and mobile payment systems, to providing collaborative and innovative care solutions to those impacted by COVID-19, many companies in the technology sector, as well as other sectors, are serving critical functions.
While many technology companies are forging on, it is certainly not business as usual for most. While discussions over force majeure, impossibility, impracticability and frustration of purpose, as well as other contractual remedies, are top of mind for many companies across all sectors, there are a few key considerations that are unique to the technology sector that bear remembering.
Intellectual Property Protection
For nearly all technology companies, development, ownership and exploitation of intellectual property will continue to play a vital role, even in the midst of a global pandemic. However, as a technology company's workforce may be entirely or largely working from home, and using personal laptops and/or mobile devices, there may be a heightened risk for inadvertent disclosure of a company's intellectual property, especially a company's trade secrets and key data assets (as well as personal information).
Companies in the technology sector may take this opportunity to remind their workforce of their obligations regarding their employer's intellectual property. You never know who may be listening in on a conference call or surreptitiously watching a video conference, and the risk of someone posting proprietary company information to social media is all too real.
Also, many states have statutory exceptions that limit a company's ability to assert ownership over developments that an employee makes on their own time without use of any company equipment, supplies, facilities, or trade secret information, unless that development relates to the employer's business, or the employee's work for the employer (for example California Labor Code 2870). It seems that with each day a new shelter-in-place or stay-at-home order is issued or revised; and, as a result, it is not always clear when an employee is working on their own time, or whether or not company equipment is being used.
As government workers and agencies around the world also face the challenges of conducting business from afar, many filing deadlines for prosecution and registration of intellectual property rights have been extended. However, those extensions are not uniform across jurisdictions. Companies in the tech sector that are seeking to register or continue the prosecution of their intellectual property are encouraged to pay careful attention to filing deadlines to ensure that they do not miss a required filing.
Access to Intellectual Property
Access to intellectual property and developments is certain to be important in technology collaboration or joint development projects. If one party to a collaboration or joint development project has not survived the turbulent economy due to the fallout of COVID-19 pandemic, the ability of the other party to either continue the project on its own or transition to another company may be challenging without access to the work product and intellectual property developed to date. Reviewing agreements for transition obligations, robust knowledge transfer obligations, as well as disaster recovery and business continuity plans, are important steps to mitigating the risk that access to its investment in the project.
Source Code Escrows
Software is a key asset of many technology companies. Technology companies who provide software or services are often asked to deposit their software into a third-party escrow account, which provides that the source code of the software will be released on the occurrence of certain specified trigger events. Though software vendors typically seek to negotiate release triggers that are limited to bankruptcy and insolvency, sometimes software vendors must concede broader release triggers that may also include a failure to perform contractual obligations or other financial insecurity short of bankruptcy and insolvency. A software vendor that has engineers sheltering-in-place may have missed a development deliverable or another obligation that could result in a release of source code.
Technology companies facing uncertain times might proactively review their escrow arrangements and take steps to minimize the risk of a source code release, which can often be a red flag in a financing or a prospective sale of the company. Licensees of software, on the other hand, should take the opportunity review their ability to access the software source code if ongoing performance by the software vendor may be at risk.
Cyber Readiness
While it seems that certain aspects of the world have come to a stop (rush hour traffic comes to mind), cybercriminals aren't taking a break and may even be more opportunistic now. As global workforces seemingly moved to remote working in a matter of days (or in some cases overnight), there may have been very little time to lock down systems to ensure confidentiality, availability and integrity of their company's supply chain's critical systems and data. Technology companies with data-centric business models and that need to maintain the confidential nature of key pieces of information (such as pricing, customer lists, bills of materials and other sensitive information) will want to review their cybersecurity practices.
Funding
Startups and emerging growth companies power the technology sector ecosystem. The recently passed stimulus bill in the U.S. may help to shore up that segment of the economy where newly minted graduates are developing the next-generation widget of the future. Where funding sources may now be more uncertain, the potential technology success stories of the future that are today's startups and emerging growth companies are urged to actively seek the funding that is now available from government sources.
Humanitarian Sharing
In many ways, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought the world together. Countries are supporting each other with supplies (such as masks) and additional healthcare workers. Companies are collaborating to share data about the COVID-19 pandemic and information that may lead to new testing and treatment options. We should all be grateful for and proud of the humanitarian effort being demonstrated.
However, as companies look to their toolkits for answers, they may assess whether the impact that sharing solutions has on possible future products and revenue streams. For example, does sharing ideas or solutions provide an advantage to a competitor that may be exploited once the crisis has passed? Given the pace of innovation in the technology sector, an improvement on what may have been considered an outdated pre-existing technology may be the basis of a new product and revenue stream. Thinking through these issues carefully and considering what may be on a technology company's short and long-term product roadmap may mean the difference in securing a future for the company.
We all hope that the COVID-19 pandemic passes quickly and that business and life will resume as we knew it. As we all telework, distance learn and have virtual social gatherings, let us remember that all of this is possible through the innovations, solutions and contributions of businesses in the technology sector. If those companies are diligent in preserving their intellectual property, ensuring that their systems are secure from intrusion, maintaining the value and access to key assets and seeking alternative sources of funding, there is no doubt that the sector will play a central role in helping the world re-emerge from the pandemic and once again power the global economy.
Victoria Lee is a Silicon Valley-based partner at global law firm DLA Piper and has been practicing in the firm's Technology and Sourcing group for more than 25 years. She focuses on representation of emerging growth and public companies in complex technology and commercial transactions in the technology sector, as well as a variety of other industry sectors. More information about cybersecurity considerations with a remote workforce and the stimulus bill can be found on DLA Piper's website.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trump’s Firing of NLRB Member Could Spark Review of Supreme Court Precedent
- 2Portuguese Law Firm Launches Tech Arm, Becoming Multidisciplinary Operation
- 3Disciplinary Board Criticizes Ethics Panel for Dismissing Charges Over Improper Firm Name
- 4AI, Innovation and ADR: The Future Is Now
- 5On The Move: Kilpatrick Adds West Coast IP Pro, Partners In Six Cities Join Nelson Mullins, Freeman Mathis
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250