UpCounsel Avoids Closure, But Concerns Over Legal Marketplaces Remain
A recession may lead to a bigger appetite for alternative legal staffing, but ethics rules and recent failures highlight the online legal marketplace sector may still face strong headwinds.
April 09, 2020 at 01:30 PM
5 minute read
Earlier this month, the UpCounsel saga seemingly came to an end. On April 2, holding company Enduring Ventures announced it purchased the online marketplace platform for an unspecified amount, according to Crunchbase.
The new owners and industry observers say the freelance lawyer marketplace connecting small businesses and startups to lawyers is still viable, but some warned those platforms may have to contend with shrinking client budgets and ethical rules barring fee sharing with nonlawyers.
UpCounsel's road to new ownership included a February announcement that it would close in March. Days later, the ABA Journal reported the shutdown was required after UpCounsel entered into a licensing agreement with LinkedIn Corp.
Soon after, UpCounsel shareholder Raj Abhyanker filed a temporary restraining order to stop the company's closure pending further court review, according to documents provided to the ABA Journal.
Now under new leadership, UpCounsel users shouldn't expect significant changes in the short term, said Enduring Ventures co-founder and UpCounsel's new chief financial officer Sieva Kozinsky.
Outside of requests from businesses and lawyers, Kozinsky doesn't anticipate modifying the platform while the new team is "figuring everything out and ramping up," he said.
Their transition doesn't only include owning a new company, but also venturing into the legal tech sector, a first for Kozinsky and Enduring Ventures co-founder and new UpCounsel acting CEO Xavier Helgesen. However, UpCounsel isn't completely new to Kozinsky.
Kozinsky's college tutoring startup was an UpCounsel client when he received an email, like other UpCounsel users, that the platform was closing. He and Helgesen reached out about acquiring the company under its new firm Enduring Ventures.
As the new owners adjust to the legal tech sector, they've brought in a team to run products and they have an in-house lawyer to work with customers. The company's goal is to provide high-quality legal services to any business, Kozinsky said.
Despite a declining economy, Kozinsky argued there's still a viable market for these services.
Indeed, the recently passed Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) included payroll protections, emergency funds and other provisions that are difficult to navigate but are applicable to small businesses, Kozinsky noted. Startups and small businesses will likely need legal counsel to understand those provisions.
"I think most businesses don't have an in-house lawyer, and the ones that don't can turn to UpCounsel, and those that do, maybe they don't have enough work to hire another in-house lawyer but too much work for the [one] general counsel," he said.
But his expectations may face a harsher reality, noted one legal staffing owner.
Basha Rubin, CEO and co-founder of outside counsel provider Priori Legal, said while Fortune 500 companies may experience revenue downswings and tighter legal spend budgets in a tough economy, small businesses and venture-backed startups struggling to raise capital may fare worse.
"I think that depending on the segment of the market you are staffing that can be different," she said. "If you're providing services for venture-backed companies, that's a different dynamic."
Still, a recession creates a necessity for flexible billing and creative approaches, noted Hire an Esquire Inc. CEO and founder Julia Shapiro. "Our clients are rethinking how they are going to hire, and I think alternative legal services like staffing are going to be accelerated once we get out of the pause freeze period we are in."
However, Shapiro cautioned that directly connecting attorneys to clients may run afoul of ethical rules.
"There's the higher potential for confusion and mismatched expectations in a consumer-to-counsel marketplace setting," she said. "If you are trying to broker those relationships, mediating the client—counsel relationship can be a landmine. When you try to broker those and are not carefully vetting lawyers for their ability to manage client relationships, you'll have a lot of issues aside from just a violation of ethics rules."
Indeed, UpCounsel ran into ethical issues when it was sued in 2018 for violating the California bar rule that blocks lawyers from sharing legal fees with nonlawyers, according to Bloomberg Law. Similar challenges from various state bar associations dogged Avvo Legal Services, including being banned in New Jersey after its state Supreme Court deemed its fee splitting unethical.
But Kozinsky said he looks forward to providing high-quality work to businesses without the Big Law price tag. "My hope is it's basically been a really nice resource for lawyers and businesses like myself. Our hope is to keep the company alive and provide a similar service."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250