UpCounsel Avoids Closure, But Concerns Over Legal Marketplaces Remain
A recession may lead to a bigger appetite for alternative legal staffing, but ethics rules and recent failures highlight the online legal marketplace sector may still face strong headwinds.
April 09, 2020 at 01:30 PM
5 minute read
Earlier this month, the UpCounsel saga seemingly came to an end. On April 2, holding company Enduring Ventures announced it purchased the online marketplace platform for an unspecified amount, according to Crunchbase.
The new owners and industry observers say the freelance lawyer marketplace connecting small businesses and startups to lawyers is still viable, but some warned those platforms may have to contend with shrinking client budgets and ethical rules barring fee sharing with nonlawyers.
UpCounsel's road to new ownership included a February announcement that it would close in March. Days later, the ABA Journal reported the shutdown was required after UpCounsel entered into a licensing agreement with LinkedIn Corp.
Soon after, UpCounsel shareholder Raj Abhyanker filed a temporary restraining order to stop the company's closure pending further court review, according to documents provided to the ABA Journal.
Now under new leadership, UpCounsel users shouldn't expect significant changes in the short term, said Enduring Ventures co-founder and UpCounsel's new chief financial officer Sieva Kozinsky.
Outside of requests from businesses and lawyers, Kozinsky doesn't anticipate modifying the platform while the new team is "figuring everything out and ramping up," he said.
Their transition doesn't only include owning a new company, but also venturing into the legal tech sector, a first for Kozinsky and Enduring Ventures co-founder and new UpCounsel acting CEO Xavier Helgesen. However, UpCounsel isn't completely new to Kozinsky.
Kozinsky's college tutoring startup was an UpCounsel client when he received an email, like other UpCounsel users, that the platform was closing. He and Helgesen reached out about acquiring the company under its new firm Enduring Ventures.
As the new owners adjust to the legal tech sector, they've brought in a team to run products and they have an in-house lawyer to work with customers. The company's goal is to provide high-quality legal services to any business, Kozinsky said.
Despite a declining economy, Kozinsky argued there's still a viable market for these services.
Indeed, the recently passed Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) included payroll protections, emergency funds and other provisions that are difficult to navigate but are applicable to small businesses, Kozinsky noted. Startups and small businesses will likely need legal counsel to understand those provisions.
"I think most businesses don't have an in-house lawyer, and the ones that don't can turn to UpCounsel, and those that do, maybe they don't have enough work to hire another in-house lawyer but too much work for the [one] general counsel," he said.
But his expectations may face a harsher reality, noted one legal staffing owner.
Basha Rubin, CEO and co-founder of outside counsel provider Priori Legal, said while Fortune 500 companies may experience revenue downswings and tighter legal spend budgets in a tough economy, small businesses and venture-backed startups struggling to raise capital may fare worse.
"I think that depending on the segment of the market you are staffing that can be different," she said. "If you're providing services for venture-backed companies, that's a different dynamic."
Still, a recession creates a necessity for flexible billing and creative approaches, noted Hire an Esquire Inc. CEO and founder Julia Shapiro. "Our clients are rethinking how they are going to hire, and I think alternative legal services like staffing are going to be accelerated once we get out of the pause freeze period we are in."
However, Shapiro cautioned that directly connecting attorneys to clients may run afoul of ethical rules.
"There's the higher potential for confusion and mismatched expectations in a consumer-to-counsel marketplace setting," she said. "If you are trying to broker those relationships, mediating the client—counsel relationship can be a landmine. When you try to broker those and are not carefully vetting lawyers for their ability to manage client relationships, you'll have a lot of issues aside from just a violation of ethics rules."
Indeed, UpCounsel ran into ethical issues when it was sued in 2018 for violating the California bar rule that blocks lawyers from sharing legal fees with nonlawyers, according to Bloomberg Law. Similar challenges from various state bar associations dogged Avvo Legal Services, including being banned in New Jersey after its state Supreme Court deemed its fee splitting unethical.
But Kozinsky said he looks forward to providing high-quality work to businesses without the Big Law price tag. "My hope is it's basically been a really nice resource for lawyers and businesses like myself. Our hope is to keep the company alive and provide a similar service."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250