As Courts Go Remote, Law Schools' Tech Development Looks to Fill the Gaps
Some law schools are quickly developing and revising technology to help those in need of court services during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it likely will be a limited effort.
April 15, 2020 at 01:57 PM
4 minute read
As COVID-19 drives courts to close and go remote, the needs of those requiring legal services may hang in the balance. Law schools' tech development efforts may be offering a vital, and safe, way for court filings to continue as usual. Still, it may be a limited effort.
Recently Suffolk University Law School's Legal Innovation and Technology Lab developed its own website-based forms in response to the closure of Massachusetts state courts.
Created with the help of volunteer lawyers, paralegals, coders and law students, the lab created web-based app forms for people to fill out if they're experiencing domestic violence, tenant lockouts or landlord disputes, said Legal Innovation and Technology Lab director David Colarusso. Once an applicant fills out a form, someone will reach out to them to complete the court filing process, Colarusso said. He added that the restraining order and landlord dispute forms are scheduled to be released this week.
While state courts in Massachusetts are largely closed, services are available for emergency orders, including temporary restraining orders and tenant disputes. To avoid in-person filing and risking COVID-19 exposure, Colarusso decided a tech-based solution would be useful.
Other schools are also turning to tech to help address coronavirus-specific legal needs. University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law Innovation for Justice Program director Stacy Butler noted the school revised its Hello Landlord online tool to generate COVID-19-specific letters for tenants that cite the federal stimulus when explaining an anticipated late payment to their landlords.
The tool was originally created last year in partnership with Brigham Young University's LawX legal design lab and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's tech subsidiary SixFifty, looking to help renters draft a letter to their landlord regarding anticipated late payments or needed fixes on the property. But clients' needs quickly changed when COVID-19 began to spread in the U.S., Butler said.
"This is the time for law schools to get creative and think about how to reach and serve those [low-income] populations when traditional models of service are failing," Butler wrote in an email. However, she added, "Technology won't be the magic access-to-justice bullet here, just as it wasn't the magic bullet before a global pandemic."
To be sure, many law schools don't have the staff to pull the trigger on many tech-based solutions, noted Suffolk's Colarusso.
"Other schools want to help, this just isn't a place where they have made a lot of investments. Most law schools don't have the in-house ability to do this sort of thing, and they haven't built the relationships needed to collaborate with the partners they need to build big projects during an emergency," he said.
"A number of apps for justice programs at law schools are one-offs without much institutional support," he added. In turn, he said it's unclear if COVID-19 will spur more law schools to develop tech-based access to justice solutions.
However, law schools don't need to necessarily leverage or develop technology to help the legal industry adjust to situations like the COVID-19 pandemic.
Albany Law School professor and Community Economic Development Clinic director Edward De Barbieri, for instance, noted that law schools should teach students the importance of remotely providing legal services.
"One way we can train the next generation of lawyers is by teaching them to facilitate meetings with video conferencing platforms and deliver legal content remotely too," he said. "Integrating that into our teaching offerings increases the ability of lawyers to meet the needs of clients these days."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Haynes Boone, Hicks Thomas Get Dismissal of $1.3B Claims in 2022 Freeport LNG Terminal Explosion
- 2Immigration Under the Trump Administration: Five Things to Expect in the First 90 Days
- 3'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
- 4NY District Attorneys Are Still No Fans of Revamped Misconduct Watchdog
- 5ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Israel's Prime Minister Over Alleged War Crimes in Gaza
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250