Legal Tech Taking Conferences Virtual, With Assist to COVID-19 Relief Efforts
Virtual conferences are allowing legal tech companies such as Litera and Rocket Matter to take on the hosting chores, while supporting the fight against COVID-19. Companies previously faced a high barrier to launching conferences due to complications like travel and locations.
April 23, 2020 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
With so much of life moving online in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, legal conferences appear to be following suit. Case in point, document technology solutions provider Litera will be hosting a virtual conference titled The Changing Lawyer LIVE! from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Central Time on Thursday, which will focus on the changes the pandemic has wrought on lawyers' day-to-day work.
Panel sessions will include: Adapting Legal Tech to New Priorities; Knowledge Management Acceleration; and The Work-From-Home Legal Professional. Each of the $25 registration fees collected will go directly to the CDC Foundation's Emergency Response Fund to assist in efforts against COVID-19.
So what's in it for Litera? Julian Morgan, the company's chief marketing officer, said that Litera usually has a lot of contact with customers during trade shows put on by the likes of the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium and others. But with even CLOC's annual Las Vegas Institute moving online this year due to COVID-19 related concerns, it became apparent that those opportunities may be few and far between in 2020.
"I think everyone right now misses the sort of in-person interaction a little bit. The isolation can be quite tough, and I think now more than ever we're reminded of the importance of the personal interaction that you get when you get to meet someone face-to-face," Morgan said.
It's not the first time that Litera has considered hosting a legal conference, but the constraints associated with travel and securing a physical location had proven too large a burden. Putting together a conference based in a virtual space like Zoom, on the other hand, was a different story. Litera started planning the event towards the end of March and is expecting between 200 to 300 participants.
Morgan thinks that the ease of setting up a virtual conference could see more legal tech companies originating their own events in the future. "I do think the barrier to entry has really dropped, and I would imagine that people can expect to see more of these [virtual conferences], at least from us," Morgan said.
Some companies have already gotten a head start. Case management and billing software provider Rocket Matter hosted a two-day virtual conference titled Rocket Aid last week, garnering 490 attendees and a combined total of $22,250 for the United Way, Feeding America and Pro Bono Net.
Larry Port, CEO of Rocket Matter, said that in a "sensitive environment," the company didn't feel comfortable pursuing its usual campaign of email marketing. The virtual conference provided a viable alternative that took only three weeks to prepare using the combination of a customized WordPress platform and Zoom videoconferencing.
Much of that time was spent thinking about how to make the virtual arena into something that could approximate the kind of interaction gleaned from a a more traditional conference setting. Panel leaders engaged with audience members in real time using Zoom's chat function and also deployed interactive polls where applicable.
Port foresees a possible future where these kinds of virtual formats are used in conjunction with in-person conferences to provide a cheaper alternative for applicants unable to travel. However, this approach could put more pressure on event organizers to differentiate the two experiences, or at least make the virtual conference feel like more than just a panel webcast.
"They won't succeed unless they are conceived of in different ways. … If it's a virtual conference, it's got to be like there's an experience for a live football game, and if people are going to go in that direction they'll have to keep that in mind," Port said.
Morgan at Litera seconded the potential difficulty of holding guests' attention during a virtual conference. After all, lawyers attending a panel held in a hotel conference room only have so many places they can go. But online the potential for distractions is much greater.
"People can get up from their computer at any time or they can open a different tab on their browser. … At the same time I think it will drive how engaging the content is because we have to keep people interested," Morgan said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Carol-Lisa Phillips to Rise to Broward Chief Judge as Jack Tuter Weighs Next Move
- 2Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 3Georgia Law Schools Seeing 24% More Applicants This Year
- 4After Shutting USAID, Trump Eyes Department of Education, CFPB
- 5‘Keep Men Out’: Female Swimmers Sue Ivy Leagues Over Lia Thomas’ Sweep
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250