Legal Tech Taking Conferences Virtual, With Assist to COVID-19 Relief Efforts
Virtual conferences are allowing legal tech companies such as Litera and Rocket Matter to take on the hosting chores, while supporting the fight against COVID-19. Companies previously faced a high barrier to launching conferences due to complications like travel and locations.
April 23, 2020 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
With so much of life moving online in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, legal conferences appear to be following suit. Case in point, document technology solutions provider Litera will be hosting a virtual conference titled The Changing Lawyer LIVE! from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Central Time on Thursday, which will focus on the changes the pandemic has wrought on lawyers' day-to-day work.
Panel sessions will include: Adapting Legal Tech to New Priorities; Knowledge Management Acceleration; and The Work-From-Home Legal Professional. Each of the $25 registration fees collected will go directly to the CDC Foundation's Emergency Response Fund to assist in efforts against COVID-19.
So what's in it for Litera? Julian Morgan, the company's chief marketing officer, said that Litera usually has a lot of contact with customers during trade shows put on by the likes of the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium and others. But with even CLOC's annual Las Vegas Institute moving online this year due to COVID-19 related concerns, it became apparent that those opportunities may be few and far between in 2020.
"I think everyone right now misses the sort of in-person interaction a little bit. The isolation can be quite tough, and I think now more than ever we're reminded of the importance of the personal interaction that you get when you get to meet someone face-to-face," Morgan said.
It's not the first time that Litera has considered hosting a legal conference, but the constraints associated with travel and securing a physical location had proven too large a burden. Putting together a conference based in a virtual space like Zoom, on the other hand, was a different story. Litera started planning the event towards the end of March and is expecting between 200 to 300 participants.
Morgan thinks that the ease of setting up a virtual conference could see more legal tech companies originating their own events in the future. "I do think the barrier to entry has really dropped, and I would imagine that people can expect to see more of these [virtual conferences], at least from us," Morgan said.
Some companies have already gotten a head start. Case management and billing software provider Rocket Matter hosted a two-day virtual conference titled Rocket Aid last week, garnering 490 attendees and a combined total of $22,250 for the United Way, Feeding America and Pro Bono Net.
Larry Port, CEO of Rocket Matter, said that in a "sensitive environment," the company didn't feel comfortable pursuing its usual campaign of email marketing. The virtual conference provided a viable alternative that took only three weeks to prepare using the combination of a customized WordPress platform and Zoom videoconferencing.
Much of that time was spent thinking about how to make the virtual arena into something that could approximate the kind of interaction gleaned from a a more traditional conference setting. Panel leaders engaged with audience members in real time using Zoom's chat function and also deployed interactive polls where applicable.
Port foresees a possible future where these kinds of virtual formats are used in conjunction with in-person conferences to provide a cheaper alternative for applicants unable to travel. However, this approach could put more pressure on event organizers to differentiate the two experiences, or at least make the virtual conference feel like more than just a panel webcast.
"They won't succeed unless they are conceived of in different ways. … If it's a virtual conference, it's got to be like there's an experience for a live football game, and if people are going to go in that direction they'll have to keep that in mind," Port said.
Morgan at Litera seconded the potential difficulty of holding guests' attention during a virtual conference. After all, lawyers attending a panel held in a hotel conference room only have so many places they can go. But online the potential for distractions is much greater.
"People can get up from their computer at any time or they can open a different tab on their browser. … At the same time I think it will drive how engaging the content is because we have to keep people interested," Morgan said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Orange Belongs to All: U-Haul Suit Argues Rival Public Storage Cannot Claim the Color
- 2Continuing Consolidation: The Biggest Legal Tech M&As of 2024
- 3FTC Announces HSR Final Rulemaking Impacting Premerger Filings
- 4NJ Cut Down on Open Judgeships in 2024, But Dozens of Vacancies Linger
- 5How to Add PR When You’ve Already Taken an ‘L’
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250