Even in Burgeoning Bankruptcy Market, Tech's Path Remains Uncertain
Law firms are already starting to see an uptick in bankruptcy or restructuring casework, but the specialized nature of that niche could prevent tech companies in the space from seeing a boost in new customers.
April 24, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
COVID-19-related slowdowns could find many businesses engaged with bankruptcy or restructuring proceedings. But whether or not that translates to an uptick in bankruptcy tech sales from law firms still remains anyone's guess. While many law firms will likely be devoting more internal resources to their bankruptcy practices, there's no sure signs that they will flock to the platforms en masse.
To be sure, there are some factors that Ed Walters, CEO of legal research company Fastcase, believes could bolster the adoption of bankruptcy tech among firms. Fastcase acquired NextChapter, a cloud-based software for preparing complex bankruptcy forms and filing them in court, in September 2019. Walters predicts that similar products will be in sudden demand by small firms who need to fold bankruptcy related services into their practice to meet the needs of clients hit hard by a COVID-19 economy.
He indicated that the number of subscribers to NextChapter's bankruptcy software doubled over the course of March and April, up 100% year over year from 2019. "I think we're going to see a major shift in 2020. We're already seeing it. Small firms who don't do bankruptcy law will have to do a little bit of bankruptcy law. It will be a structural change in law firms," Walters said.
But that may not be true for all firms. While Chris Ward, chair of the bankruptcy and restructuring practice at Polsinelli, does expect that attorneys will continue to see a rise in bankruptcy-related activity, he thinks most of that work will likely go to firms who are already established in that area rather than small firms who are adapting on the fly.
"Bankruptcy is kind of a very niche practice, like most very particular, statute-driven practices. So it's not that easy to just step in and start representing companies in Chapter 11. It's much easier to represent creditors in Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases and push their interests. We see that all the time," Ward said.
He pointed to the 2008 recession as an example of how firms might adapt to the influx of bankruptcy cases by temporarily repurposing attorneys from slower disciplines like loan origination or real estate finance to help with the increased workload. But will those lawyers be on boarding more tech?
The answer is likely "yes." But people who spoke with LTN were mixed on whether this tech would be bankruptcy-specific tools or industrywide products like videoconferencing platform Zoom that enable remote working or court proceedings. "We've been required to adapt and do more remotely," said Stephen Selbst, co-chair of the finance litigation and restructuring group at Herrick, Feinsten.
However, Nathan Cemenska, director of legal operations and industry insights at Wolters Kluwer's ELM Solutions, thinks attorneys will likely gravitate towards bankruptcy-specific tools that can assist with bankruptcy filings or more mindless work like the preparation of forms and notices.
"It's definitely going to be good for companies that sell this kind of software," Cemenska said.
Whether it will be good for the attorneys themselves is possibly another story. Per Cemenska, firms looking to swiftly meet new client demand may find their progress impeded by the amount of training required to get lawyers up to speed with bankruptcy tools. Lawyers without much prior experience with those solutions may not get the value they were hoping to extract.
"It's going to be an effort for them to get trained on it and get integrated into their processes in a very sudden way. I think the people who are really going to benefit are the people who adopted this technology long ago," Cemenska said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250