Slaughters Presses Pause on Emerging Tech Programs Due to COVID-19
Collaborate, which provides legal support and assistance to legal tech start-ups, and Fast Forward, which offered emerging technology start-ups value-add services, have been paused as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
April 27, 2020 at 07:30 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com International
Slaughter and May has postponed its flagship tech programs, Collaborate and Fast Forward, as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.
Both were of keen interest to the legal technology community as they offer access to top clients and legal advice.
The Collaborate program, aimed at developing legal tech companies, is currently suspended for a "number of weeks" according to a spokesperson for the firm. The timeline for the program will remain under review on an ongoing basis, they added.
The firm had been due to select six to eight legal tech businesses to form its 2020 cohort this month.
In a statement on the Collaborate website, the firm said: "We are keen to commence the programme at a time when it is both safe to do so, and when we are able to offer our selected cohort members, our clients, and members of our advisory panel the best level of support and engagement around all things legal tech."
Launched last year, Collaborate provides legal support and assistance to legal technology start-ups and scale-ups. Selected companies gain access to the firm's lawyers and information security team, a sandbox environment to test products, and access to the firm's collaboration spaces and meeting rooms.
A new addition for the 2020 program will see successful applicants receiving advice from venture capitalist funds and other legal tech entrepreneurs on securing funding.
Last year the program selected six startups after receiving more than 50 entries. Some of the firm's clients, including GlaxoSmithKline, John Lewis, Santander, Standard Chartered and Vodafone had agreed to test and assess the small firms' products in development.
Meanwhile, Slaughter and May's Fast Forward program has not yet been launched for this year, with plans currently paused, according to a person with knowledge of the situation.
Fast Forward is geared towards emerging technology start-ups and scale-ups, particularly in the fintech sector. Launched in 2016, the scheme offers participants up to £30,000 in value-add services including legal support, coaching and access to the firm's networks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Avoiding Inadvertent Conflict Issues With Constituents When Representing Organizational Clients
- 2Debtor-Owner Allowed to Modify Mortgage in Bankruptcy Even if Debtor Is Not Obligor Under the Mortgage Loan
- 3Legal Chief of Retailer Beyond Exiting at Tumultuous Time
- 4Law Firm Real Estate Strategy: Attorney Offices Are Out, Conference Rooms Are In
- 5AI Governance In Practice
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250