To Deliver New Forms of Value, Firms Need to Move Beyond the Application Mindset
Law firms have built up tremendous value within their practices, people and processes, but these capabilities tend to be poorly integrated due in large part to a fragmented legal technology landscape.
April 27, 2020 at 10:00 AM
5 minute read
As businesses adjust to whatever is the "new normal" during uncertain times, law firms have a unique opportunity to create technology-enhanced business services for clients that extend well beyond legal advice. For the most part, the components they need to accomplish this are already in place, including advanced applications, troves of data and knowledge capital accumulated over years of providing high-quality legal services to corporate clients.
The current challenge, however, is figuring out how to bring these components together to enable more effective, cross-functional collaboration—both within firms and between firms and their clients.
Bundling Legal and Business Services
The current trend toward bundling legal counsel with business services is very much client-driven. Corporate clients want the legal expertise of firms to be more closely aligned with their strategic business goals. Clients' increasing insistence on transparency, accountability and service continuity is prompting firms to rethink existing approaches to client service delivery. The goal is to help clients solve challenging and complex business problems, in addition to offering legal advice.
Contract management is a good example. The role of the firm is no longer just to review the next contract, but rather to manage the entire contract lifecycle. This includes not only drafting, negotiation and approval processes, but also applying analytics across multiple contracts to identify patterns and enable continual data-driven process improvements, risk reduction, compliance and improved governance.
Many law firms already have the necessary expertise (both legal and operational) to accomplish this. Although, the fragmented nature of their IT infrastructure and difficulties in integrating workflows across systems may impact their ability to deliver end-to-end contract management for clients seamlessly and efficiently.
Assembly Provides the Best Value
Reflexive investment in new applications is not the solution to this problem. Instead, firms need better ways to connect work management and service delivery capabilities more seamlessly so they can respond quickly, nimbly and effectively to client demands.
That's why we're seeing firms explore digital platform strategies that can help them unite disparate technologies and services. Leveraging and linking existing capabilities minimizes disruption and makes change management easier. Instead of replacing existing tools, workflows, processes and know-how, firms need to be able to develop customized collaborative workspaces where these components are integrated and complement each other.
Case lifecycle management or multi-matter management is another instructive example. This is a business challenge firms can solve by adopting an "assembly" approach—connecting and storing the data that resides in discovery tools, practice management systems, file management systems and case management systems, as well as emails and spreadsheets. Bringing all of this together into a single portal and workspace enables real-time collaboration and ongoing data analytics. Instead of sending clients emails and spreadsheets, firms invite clients to log into a secure portal to view data points across multiple cases, isolate trends and insights, and make better-informed decisions about case strategy, budget priorities, practice management, resource allocation and more.
The Increasing Importance of Speed and Agility
Innovative law firms are embracing new business models and investing in solutions that enable them to move quickly to address new opportunities and competition. To compete, firms will have to be able to develop new technology-enhanced services with speed and agility. "Rip and replace" development strategies are costly, time-intensive and disruptive. Instead, firms need to deploy flexible, adaptable and reusable components that can be quickly customized and deployed in new ways.
Firms that adopt a low-code assembly approach to development will be in a much better position to "template" best practices across multiple business challenges and opportunities that are similar. For instance, with flexible, agile development tools and processes, a firm could build an incident management system with the requisite processes from scratch in a matter of hours.
The system would be designed to manage incidents from start to finish, integrating governance procedures, tasks, deadlines and compliance requirements. All of this could be managed collaboratively from a portal that keeps the client up to date on any incident and enables efficient project management from a single interface. The portal would facilitate secure, real-time collaboration between clients and the firm's legal and operational experts, and it could also be used to share key information with regulators. Then, once such a system is set up, it can be saved as a template that forms the basis for managing new incidents and projects, and even for new clients. With the template established, it can be set up and customized in a matter of minutes.
Law firms have built up tremendous value within their practices, people and processes, but these capabilities tend to be poorly integrated due in large part to a fragmented legal technology landscape. As firms look to remain competitive and deliver transformative services to clients, simply investing in new applications will no longer suffice. They will need flexible platforms that allow for the rapid assembly of tools, processes, workflows and data into customized collaborative workspaces that are readily adaptable and replicable.
Graham Smith-Bernal is CEO of Opus 2.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250