Facebook's New Cryptocurrency Plan Still Faces Sovereignty, Regulatory Hurdles
Regulators still aren't sure what to do with Libra and the multicurrency-backed cryptocurrency of its ilk, lawmakers say.
April 28, 2020 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
After facing nearly unanimous international backlash, last week Facebook Inc. unveiled new plans for its cryptocurrency Libra, including backing a coin with multiple currencies. Despite the changes, Facebook hasn't made it clear what Libra is and how it should be regulated, and lawyers said the company will likely face stiff apprehension from regulators.
The Libra Association, the group responsible for the governance and development of the Libra network that includes Facebook's Calibra, Lyft, CoinBase, Spotify and others as members, released an updated white paper announcing the changes.
Most notably, Libra will not be a separate digital currency, as originally announced in June 2019. Instead, the Libra Association plans to release a series of stablecoins, which are cryptocurrencies backed by currencies or commodities, directly tied to a specific government-backed currency. This allows Libra users to directly access a stablecoin in their currency, if their country has issued single-currency stablecoins, Libra explained.
Additionally, the association will issue a "digital composite" of multiple single-currency stablecoins available on the Libra network, which includes the U.S. dollar, euro and others instead of a single currency. The digital composite is available for cross-border transactions and for use in countries with no digital currency, unlike the single-currency stablecoin, the association wrote.
Libra also announced it scrapped its permissionless blockchain plan and is limiting Libra support for the underbanked and unbanked to strengthen its compliance framework.
To be sure, the changes were made in response to various regulators' sovereignty and security concerns, the organization admitted. However, lawyers said the latest changes may not be enough because Libra hasn't said exactly what it is—and most importantly, what government agency should regulate it.
"The main question in my mind is whether this instrument would be regarded as a transferable security for the purposes of the EU Prospectus Regulation and/or an ETF [exchange-traded fund] for the purposes of the Investment Company Act of 1940," wrote Anderson Kill partner Preston Byrne in an email.
Byrne noted an unfavorable regulatory decision could end any company's stablecoin ambitions for a cryptocoin backed by multiple currencies.
"An adverse determination in either jurisdiction would severely limit the ability for the Libra Association to promote that instrument as a medium of exchange in each jurisdiction and, accordingly, world-wide. Libra is attempting to mitigate this by registering as a payments firm with the Swiss regulator FINMA, but Swiss law classifications are not dispositive to U.S. and EU regulatory treatment," he noted.
Shipkevich founder and principal Felix Shipkevich, whose practice includes blockchain technology and corporate governance, said most countries aren't going to budge on their resistance until Libra declares what it is.
"I don't know if legislators can necessarily block it, but [instead] pause the effort in order to first understand who will regulate it," he said. "You have to take a position if you're offering a financial product of any kind [and say], 'I'm issuing X, subject to the purview of this law.'"
Facebook's high-profile roadblocks highlight a broader push to understand regulating and bringing a stablecoin to market, Shipkevich argued.
"We are on uncharted territory; that makes this whole case study with Libra and how governments will respond to it very interesting," he said. He noted the rare joint France-Germany financial statement released September 2019, which stated Facebook's blueprint failed to address money laundering, terrorism financing, data protection and financial and monetary sovereignty concerns raised by cryptocurrencies and stablecoins.
While Libra's outcome is in the air, Shipkevich said stablecoins' future isn't tied directly to Libra's success or failure.
"I think what this does still show to the mainstream is that cryptocurrency is still important if Facebook and other organizations are [still] on board with the Libra Association," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250