ABA, NYSBA Turn to Legal Tech Providers for COVID-19 Pro Bono Efforts
A national public health emergency, high-octane tornadoes and earthquakes all happening within a single month has left bar associations with significant demands for disaster relief. They are turning to legal tech to meet those vast challenges.
April 30, 2020 at 09:01 AM
4 minute read
As the COVID-19 outbreak continues to disrupt life in the U.S., bar associations are turning to legal tech to help streamline their attorney intake process to keep pace with the growing demand for pro bono services.
Today the American Bar Association announced its partnership with Paladin, Clio and LegalZoom to launch the ABA's pro bono portal to connect interested attorneys with pro bono opportunities.
Through a portal, lawyers can view pro bono opportunities listed by legal service organizations, explained ABA Disaster Legal Services vice director Amanda Brown. Attorneys interested in a matter submit their bar number and general contact information, and the legal service organization reaches out to them. Brown said she anticipates pro bono work concerning unemployment and other government benefits, housing, domestic violence and consumer law issues.
The portal was created by Paladin with funding from case management platform Clio and legal services platform LegalZoom, Brown and the companies confirmed.
To be sure, Paladin is no stranger to the pro bono world. The platform is leveraged by law firms and legal service organizations to create and share available pro bono matters and simplify viewing and signing up for volunteer work,
Likewise, connecting vast amounts of attorneys to pro bono work isn't new for the ABA Disaster Legal Services. However, it became apparent that it wasn't feasible to manually track attorneys' pro bono interests during current circumstances, Brown explained.
"Our existing mechanisms were fine through spreadsheets and working locally with partners and social media to recruit people. But the public health crisis really put a microscope on how we were doing things, how inefficient it would be with 50 states all at one time," she said.
Recent successive disasters also demanded a quicker and larger scale response, Brown added.
Indeed, in March, while COVID-19 caused many states to issue stay-at-home mandates, two 175 mph tornadoes caused 25 deaths and significant property damage in central Tennessee and ongoing earthquakes roiled Puerto Rico as it rebuilds after 2017′s destructive Hurricane Maria.
The new Paladin-developed tool will be used for COVID-19, Tennessee and Puerto Rico pro bono matters and is Disaster Legal Services' "long-standing new way to recruit volunteers and match them to service providers," Brown announced.
Like the ABA, the New York State Bar Association has also leveraged legal tech to quickly answer urgent demands stoked by COVID-19, said the state bar's president and Greenberg Traurig shareholder Hank Greenberg.
Originally, the NYSBA intended to deploy pro bono attorneys to assist after COVID subsided, Greenberg said. But a request from the governor's office to help New Yorkers gain unemployment benefits and appeal denials shifted the NYSBA's focus, Greenberg explained.
The association reached out to Clio CEO and co-founder Jack Newton, with whom the association worked previously, and Newton suggested they also work with Paladin, Greenberg said. Roughly three weeks after the initial suggestion from the governor office's, the NYSBA launched an unemployment insurance relief intake and pro bono attorney form.
The form was created through Clio Grow, Clio's client intake software, which the NYSBA uses to pair participants to an attorney listed on Paladin. (Clio noted neither the NYSBA and ABA partnerships were funded through its $1 million disaster fund announced in March.)
Greenberg confirmed the Clio-Paladin formula will be used for other COVID-19-related pro bono offerings, including domestic violence and creditor disputes.
"It's unique and unprecedented in its scope and that is all predicated on a technological platform that in itself, in its sophistication, is something we haven't seen before and it's a breakthrough. Now that we have this template we are going to use it with other practice areas," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 2Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 3How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 4Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 5Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250