COVID-19 Is Making Corporate Law and IT Friends With Long-Term Benefits
COVID-19 forced corporate legal and IT departments to come together on remote working policies, but that relationship could carry over to the implementation of technologies after the shutdowns end.
April 30, 2020 at 01:30 PM
3 minute read
Corporate legal and IT departments haven't enjoyed much overlap throughout the years, something that may have impacted a business' companywide outlook on important issues such as cybersecurity or information governance. But that may be changing as corporate attorneys and resident IT experts seek to address both the risk and technical challenges of moving towards the remote working environment necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Susanna McDonald, chief legal officer at the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC), framed the trend as an extension of a relationship that began as companies were trying to navigate both the policy and cybersecurity-related issues posed by privacy regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).
"The lawyers are talking about this with their board of directors. They are talking about cybersecurity and risk with their board of directors. … So the legal departments are getting involved and in order to be able to do that, they have to have a good relationship with the IT department," she said.
Lawyers were needed to interpret the legal nuances of the CCPA and the steps a company may have to take towards compliance, while IT departments could provide reality checks around the technical feasibility of such initiatives while laying the technical groundwork necessary for execution. Gulam Zade, CEO of Logicforce, indicated that a similar arrangement has emerged to deal with the sudden onslaught of remote working needs.
From an IT perspective, for instance, it can be more daunting to secure a network of devices spread from home-to-home than one that is centralized in a shared office space. Those same cyber vulnerabilities—some of which have already emerged in the shape of phishing scams—also raise the legal risk associated with the threat of breaches and stolen or lost data. For companies, developing a solid remote working strategy has required legal and IT departments to share notes.
"I think this has really brought the two groups together as they plan long-term plans for organizations on how they are going to deal with however long this COVID virus and the work from home situation lasts," Zade said.
But once the virus recedes and businesses potentially return to something approaching a new normal, a stronger relationship between legal and IT departments could begin bearing fruit beyond company policies or cybersecurity postures. McDonald with the ACC believes the framework companies established to assist with remote working could also yield long-term gains for legal department efficiency.
She pointed towards the implementation of technologies like remote signature solutions, which could a become a more regular fixture inside legal departments after serving as a necessary bridge in times of social distancing. McDonald also noted that remote working has actually yielded higher productivity inside some organizations, so IT departments may expected to keep video conferencing and other remote working platforms going strong even once they are no longer strictly necessary.
"We're all going to be looking at probably faster adoption of IT to help us get our job done faster and more efficiently," McDonald said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Lawyer’s Resolutions: Focusing on 2025
- 2Houston Judge Exonerated on Appeal, Public Reprimand Vacated
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 30
- 4Employment Law Developments to Expect From the Second Trump Administration
- 5How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250