Legal Tech is Allowing Firms to Offer Immigration Benefits to Retain Associates
Until recently, offering a Green Card (EB-2 visa) as an incentive was too expensive and time consuming for law firms to seriously consider. But some legal tech companies are looking to change that.
April 30, 2020 at 07:00 AM
5 minute read
Recently, a law school classmate of mine was informed that she did not win a spot in the H-1B lottery. She was devastated—in just an instant her life had been turned totally upside down. She had lived in the United States for close to 18 years and had made a life here. She had excelled in school, went on to graduate from Harvard Law School, and began working at one of the most prestigious law firms in the country. Despite all of this, she was informed that her current visa will end in July and, should nothing else happen in the interim, she would be forced to leave the country in July to return to her home country of Venezuela—a country she has not lived in since she was four years old.
She is one of many people who has recently been informed that they may soon be forced to leave the US. The H-1B lottery program is frequently heavily oversubscribed, and companies that had won H-1B slots in the lottery were informed of this on March 31. Shortly after March 31, tens of thousands of people found themselves in the same position as my classmate. She is not the only the law firm associate to face this problem in 2020, and there will inevitably be many more law firm associates that may find themselves in her position over the coming years.
Even if she had won a H-1B visa in the lottery, her visa would only be valid for 3-6 years and then she would have to apply all over again and face the chance that she may have to leave the country.
For the many associates that have immigration needs, like my classmate, offering immigration benefits beyond helping them apply for a H-1B visa can be a crucial incentive for them. Until recently, offering a Green Card (EB-2 visa) or other visas as an incentive was too expensive and time consuming to be seriously considered by HR departments at law firms. Now, there are startups that have streamlined visa applications and are offering packages that should allow for law firms to seamlessly offer their employees an opportunity to apply for an EB-2 visa or other visas.
Legalpad—a Seattle based startup that specializes in filing O-1, B-1, H-1B, and EB-2 visas—has streamlined the EB-2 visa process and is now offering law firms a package that would allow them to sponsor and pay for the EB-2 visas of their associates with the aim of solving an expensive headache for associates and providing law firms a way to both retain and attract mid-level associates. Firms can either make monthly payments to Legalpad or one discounted upfront payment to secure a visa for their attorneys. Legalpad has streamlined the process by automating form filling, creating a dashboard to track the progress of the visa, creating intake and drafting tools that have simplified the user interface making it easy for applicants to give relevant information, and automating all payments.
Passright—a company that specializes in O-1 visa processing—has an offering that can help when associates find themselves in an emergency situation like my classmate (i.e. they lost the visa lottery and have months before they face deportation). Although O-1 visas are typically thought of being reserved for engineers and startup founders, the guidelines for an O-1 visa could allow for a viable case to be made for attorneys that fit the requirements. While this visa is being processed, you may remain in the country. The drawback to this situation is that working in the country while waiting for this visa to process may be tough or not possible.
Since law firms typically handle the initial H-1B filing, it is often a year or two before those visa holders are considering their immigration options again. At that point in their career, the associate will have become a highly sought after mid-level associate who could easily transfer law firms. Law firms offer a whole host of things from bonuses to more vacation days in an attempt to attract or retain mid-level associates, and outside of law firms offering immigration benefits to retain or attract talent is not uncommon. I currently sit as a Board Observer to Legalpad, and have noted during my diligence on them that many big tech companies, like Facebook, already offer immigration benefits and assistance to their employees.
I have spoken to other law firm associates who were waiting on their H-1B lottery results. The most common emotion they experienced while going through the H-1B lottery process was extreme anxiety spurred by total uncertainty. The uncertainty is understandable, since the immigration landscape changes rapidly, and sometimes by the hour, which is a pace that tech startups are well suited to keep up with. Fortunately, there are now legal tech startups that have streamlined visa processes and turned it into a benefit that is feasible for a law firm to offer their associates so they may never have to worry again about being forced to leave the country.
Samuel Garcia is a recent graduate of Harvard Law School and currently a Senior Associate at Amplo, a Venture Capital fund.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250