Cash Crunch: COVID-19 Is Changing How Legal Uses E-billing Tech
E-billing and spend management providers are seeing a shift in interest towards solutions that fuel analytics-based decision making, which in the future may be critical to successfully managing a remote workforce.
May 07, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
In a COVID-19 economy, law firms and legal departments could be monitoring their respective cash flows more closely, driving renewed interest in e-billing and spend management solutions that can help illuminate potential savings or causes for concern. Still, while the vendors behind those solutions may be seeing an uptick in business, the more sustainable path to growth may revolve around tools that allow employers to better track the productivity of a newly remote workforce.
Other changes or demands with regards to corporate legal or law firm financials may be short-lived. For example, Nathan Wenzel, co-founder of SimpleLegal, said many people are hoping there's a movement away from the billable hour towards fixed fees, but a shift like that won't happen in one swift movement.
"You're going to see a big swing and then you are going to see the pendulum come back. You won't see it come back all the way, and that's kind of how progress happens," Wenzel said.
But law firms and legal departments are reexamining their bottom lines. Wenzel indicated that SimpleLegal has noticed a recent shift in the way existing corporate customers are engaging with the e-billing and spend management on its platform. Traditionally, those clients have been focused on using those tools to help manage or run a legal department more effectively. Now, users are expressing more interest in solutions that help reinforce billing guidelines or analyze law firms and their rates.
"We see a renewed interest in the costs savings side that, quite frankly, when we launched the company we didn't see as much of," Wenzel said.
The ongoing drive towards cost savings has already had an impact not only on the direction of products, but the rollout as well. Jeffrey Solomon, senior director of product management, data analytics at Wolters Kluwer ELM Solutions, said the company is trying to shorten the onboarding process for corporate clients to implement solutions like its LegalVIEW BillAnalyzer Data Service, which was introduced in February.
"What we are trying to do is make it really easy for them to implement this, so where we can provide kind of a best practices approach from both a change management perspective and how they roll this out internally and how they role this out with their law firms, but also in taking it to the next level" Solomon said.
Like SimpleLegal, Wolters Kluwer ELM has also seen the focus of e-billing tools shift from department management to analytics-based decision-making. Solomon said they've seen other providers start to establish bill review practices and build AI solutions, but entering that market may be easier said than done thanks to the volume of data required to power the analytics.
"We have a three-and-a-half-years start on everybody. We have these AI solutions and the benefit of that data and the benefit of dozens of customers working within those AI solutions," Solomon said.
There are other complications as well, including the difficulty of building an e-billing or spend management tool that can integrate across multiple client systems, like finance, patent or HR departments. This may hold especially true as companies continue transitioning to a more remote workforce, something that Wenzel at SimpleLegal expects will linger post COVID-19.
As a result, spend management and e-billing solutions could be leveraged to help law firms or legal departments track the productivity of their employees, whether it's by hours billed or other hard metrics.
"That move requires tools that allow you to measure and understand and to be quantitative. And so that change is the one that will last," Wenzel said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250