Don't Get Cocky: Firms May Not Be Prepared for Long-Term Remote Work
While the legal industry has largely been able to transition to remote work, industry observers say a permanent switch to telecommuting will require new security and IT policies.
May 07, 2020 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
Roughly a month-and-a-half after California issued the first COVID-19 stay-at-home mandate in the U.S., with nearly all other states soon following, many lawyers and their staffers have likely settled into a routine for remotely working.
But while successful, the legal industry's sudden shift to remote work didn't include the significant data governance and tech considerations needed for a more permanent, long-term switch to telecommuting, industry observers warned.
However, as law firms slowly reopen and consider offering permanent telecommuting status to attorneys and staffers, their policies have to be adjusted. For now, most firms' telecommuting polices are short-term and one-off, said certified information privacy professional and Cozen O'Connor member Brian Kint.
"It wasn't necessarily a solution for a long-term use where you have employees working remotely everyday," said Kint. "Those policies may not be tailored to those situations and flexibility may need to be included."
One consideration for long-term policies is that while flexibility regarding leveraging technology to meet a client's demand is important while telecommuting, it cannot be at the risk of harming the firm's cybersecurity, noted Cozen O'Connor cybersecurity consultant Trevor McGuinness. He explained that consistent telecommuting exposes a law firm's firmware and data to various software that must be continuously evaluated.
"At the end of the day, to adopt these temporary decisions to get people up and running remotely for a long term would be haphazard at best," said McGuinness. "I think companies will have to look at their infrastructures to know how their applications interact and [if there's] any security gaps."
A significant remote workforce also ushers in other hurdles for a law firm or company's IT department, he added.
"Inventory management is one area most IT departments may not have the best and strict policies [for], especially in the wake of the COVID pandemic," he said. McGuinness added that tracking data across company-owned and personal electronics, logging access to data and early notifications spotting worrisome actions would also be crucial for supporting a permanent remote workforce.
Software and electronics also muddies ethical and legal compliance, with telecommuting raising the likelihood of misplacing data, Kint noted.
"When everyone is at the same physical location and has easy access to a firm's networks, it's easier to control the data. But as people disperse in their remote workspace, they can have a tendency to not adhere to the policies and procedures in place," Kint said. "Employees may have a sense that they need to send something to a personal email or put a document into their Dropbox." Such lax behavior can lead to losing data and ethical issues may arise when clients' sensitive or confidential matters are exposed, he added.
In response, a long-term remote working policy should be tailored by including ongoing education detailing the law firm's data sharing and storage policies, Kint said. When remotely working long-term, fostering a culture of compliance is also important when lawyers and staffers aren't working under direct supervision.
"It can be a little bit easier to kind of let things go, let minor things go when most of the workforce is in the office," Kint said. "But when lawyers are largely dispersed throughout the country there needs to be strict compliance to make sure the data is where it needs to be so the law firm has control of the data."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250