Don't Get Cocky: Firms May Not Be Prepared for Long-Term Remote Work
While the legal industry has largely been able to transition to remote work, industry observers say a permanent switch to telecommuting will require new security and IT policies.
May 07, 2020 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
Roughly a month-and-a-half after California issued the first COVID-19 stay-at-home mandate in the U.S., with nearly all other states soon following, many lawyers and their staffers have likely settled into a routine for remotely working.
But while successful, the legal industry's sudden shift to remote work didn't include the significant data governance and tech considerations needed for a more permanent, long-term switch to telecommuting, industry observers warned.
However, as law firms slowly reopen and consider offering permanent telecommuting status to attorneys and staffers, their policies have to be adjusted. For now, most firms' telecommuting polices are short-term and one-off, said certified information privacy professional and Cozen O'Connor member Brian Kint.
"It wasn't necessarily a solution for a long-term use where you have employees working remotely everyday," said Kint. "Those policies may not be tailored to those situations and flexibility may need to be included."
One consideration for long-term policies is that while flexibility regarding leveraging technology to meet a client's demand is important while telecommuting, it cannot be at the risk of harming the firm's cybersecurity, noted Cozen O'Connor cybersecurity consultant Trevor McGuinness. He explained that consistent telecommuting exposes a law firm's firmware and data to various software that must be continuously evaluated.
"At the end of the day, to adopt these temporary decisions to get people up and running remotely for a long term would be haphazard at best," said McGuinness. "I think companies will have to look at their infrastructures to know how their applications interact and [if there's] any security gaps."
A significant remote workforce also ushers in other hurdles for a law firm or company's IT department, he added.
"Inventory management is one area most IT departments may not have the best and strict policies [for], especially in the wake of the COVID pandemic," he said. McGuinness added that tracking data across company-owned and personal electronics, logging access to data and early notifications spotting worrisome actions would also be crucial for supporting a permanent remote workforce.
Software and electronics also muddies ethical and legal compliance, with telecommuting raising the likelihood of misplacing data, Kint noted.
"When everyone is at the same physical location and has easy access to a firm's networks, it's easier to control the data. But as people disperse in their remote workspace, they can have a tendency to not adhere to the policies and procedures in place," Kint said. "Employees may have a sense that they need to send something to a personal email or put a document into their Dropbox." Such lax behavior can lead to losing data and ethical issues may arise when clients' sensitive or confidential matters are exposed, he added.
In response, a long-term remote working policy should be tailored by including ongoing education detailing the law firm's data sharing and storage policies, Kint said. When remotely working long-term, fostering a culture of compliance is also important when lawyers and staffers aren't working under direct supervision.
"It can be a little bit easier to kind of let things go, let minor things go when most of the workforce is in the office," Kint said. "But when lawyers are largely dispersed throughout the country there needs to be strict compliance to make sure the data is where it needs to be so the law firm has control of the data."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1MoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
- 2Antitrust in Trump 2.0: Expect Gap Filling from State Attorneys General
- 3People in the News—Jan. 22, 2025—Knox McLaughlin, Saxton & Stump
- 4How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be Open to Opportunities, Ready to Seize Them When They Arise,' Says Lara Shortz of Michelman & Robinson
- 5The Intersection of Labor Law and Politics Following the Presidential Election
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250