Tech on the Chopping Block in Post-COVID Budget Proposal for Philadelphia Legal Agencies
Agencies are bracing for belt-tightening, which could mean delayed tech investments, not hiring new attorneys and putting strict caps on the legal spend for outside counsel.
May 08, 2020 at 01:40 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
This article is an excerpt from a full piece on the budget cuts, available on The Legal Intelligencer.
The Philadelphia court system, the District Attorney's Office, the Defender Association and the City Law Department are all slated to take cuts under Mayor Jim Kenney's latest budget proposal, which was recently revised to reflect the grim financial situation the country has found itself in during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The agencies are facing a range of proposed cuts, and leaders were quick to stress that the process is still ongoing. However, the agencies are bracing for belt-tightening, which could mean delayed tech investments, not hiring new attorneys and putting strict caps on the legal spend for outside counsel.
At the start of May, Kenney proposed a budget that cut nearly $650 million from the spending plan he had initially proposed to City Council in early March. The shortfall comes as COVID-19-related business closures have halted real estate and economic activity, and staggering unemployment has struck a blow to the city's expected wage tax earnings. The plan, announced May 1, proposes spending $4.9 billion, which is a 4.4% decrease compared to the initial projections.
The Law Department is set to see a significant cut, if the mayor's proposal is enacted. The new budget proposes an 11% decrease for the agency, or a reduction of $1.8 million from the $16.3 million that had been initially proposed. The department had been set for a slight increase in the 2021 budget; however, the new proposal would bring the department's budget to less than what was adopted in 2019.
City Solicitor Marcel Pratt noted that the 11% drop does not give the full picture of the potential impact to his office's budget, since compensation for about 100 of the agency's 225 attorneys are funded through other city agencies. However, he said that, if enacted as proposed, the Law Department could see delays in rolling out new legal tech projects and serious belt-tightening for the outside legal spend.
"As we assign work under our current contracts, we're going to have to implement very strict budgets, and probably be more conservative about what we send out," Pratt said.
On the tech side, he said the office had been looking to hire a full-time e-discovery specialist to help implement the roll-out of new software, but that may be on pause given the new budget proposal.
"A project that's been very important to me since I started has been acquiring an e-discovery platform," Pratt said. "I can't say that's not going to happen, but it's something that's been called into question."
Another project he'd been eager to bring online but that might now be on hold is the implementation of a document management platform, which would increase functionality and allow attorneys to search across the city's entire legal database. The training budget might also see cuts, Pratt said, and the agency's travel budget for CLE programs, which Pratt noted had been greatly expanded recently, could also see reductions.
"You always have grand plans for making the office better, and then this happens," he said, adding he is going to continue to push for ways to keep these projects in the works despite the budget cuts. "It's hard. Everybody's making very tough decisions."
The mayor's budget, however, is the first step in the process for allocating funds to city agencies, and it is City Council that will have the ultimate say. According to the council's web page, no schedule has yet been set for budget testimony by the agency heads.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Troutman Pepper, Claiming Ex-Associate's Firing Was Performance Related, Seeks Summary Judgment in Discrimination Suit
- 2Law Firm Fails to Get Punitive Damages From Ex-Client
- 3Over 700 Residents Near 2023 Derailment Sue Norfolk for More Damages
- 4Decision of the Day: Judge Sanctions Attorney for 'Frivolously' Claiming All Nine Personal Injury Categories in Motor Vehicle Case
- 5Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250