In Shrinking Job Market, Can Recent Grads Find Opportunity in Legal Tech?
While recent law school grads are sought after by legal tech companies, law schools say career opportunities in the legal tech market are still limited.
May 13, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Stark unemployment rates, law firm salary cuts and the suspension of summer associate programs may leave some upcoming law school graduates unsure about their job prospects.
But what recent law school graduates lack in experience, they make up for in understanding and speaking the legalese that carries influence and makes them attractive additions to legal tech companies.
While having a legal background isn't a necessity, a candidate with a J.D. would have an advantage when applying for a client-facing position at contract management company Evisort, said the company's co-founder and CEO Jerry Ting.
"They understand the culture and language of the legal world versus someone from the IT world," Ting said.
Similar legal education and shared experiences can also be useful when attempting to persuade a law firm or in-house lawyer to license software or change their workflow.
"The reason for that [trust] is a good one: We were trained and educated in the same way and when we try to solve a problem for a client there's a baseline of understanding we have," Ting explained.
Still, law schools aren't seeing significant market demand for their students in legal tech.
"Legal tech has never been a big employer of law school graduates," noted Suffolk Law School Dean Andrew Perlman.
In turn, law schools aren't developing educational tracks geared toward a career in legal tech. Instead, law schools are emphasizing how legal tech, data analysis and optimized project management enhances client solutions, said Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law director of law and technology initiatives Daniel Linna Jr.
"It's irresponsible for law schools to graduate students who do not have a growing understanding and basic technology competencies and an understanding of how technology is impacting the delivery of legal services," Linna said.
Still, Dean Gonsowski, a lawyer and chief revenue officer of e-discovery and information governance tech provider Active Navigation, argued law students shouldn't view the traditional law firm route as their only opportunity.
"The law firm profession is hard to break into and the track to partner isn't what it used to be," he said. "If you're really into and committed to it, it can make sense, but if you have other options I would look at them."
Those alternatives include legal tech sales, which can be a lucrative opportunity for attorneys that recently earned a J.D., Gonsowski said.
"Attorneys selling to attorneys is pretty fruitful and the better sales people I know in the legal tech industry have J.D.s and have practiced," he said. "It's not direct use of the [law school] training, but it can be pretty lucrative."
Aside from sales, attorneys also commonly fill a legal tech company's "discrete consulting" and project management role for e-discovery, information governance, data protection and other matters, Gonsowski said.
In addition, there's a "tremendous need" for subject matter expertise and content development in legal technology that recent law school grads can provide, Gonsowski said. Such job responsibilities may include writing blogs, white papers and a software's rules for General Data Protection Regulation, California Consumer Privacy Act and other regulatory compliance tools.
Those looking at the legal tech career path can bolster their chances by obtaining certifications and training provided by tech companies and law schools, said Relativity Academic Partner program leader Janice Hollman.
Gonsowski also urged recently graduated or current law school students interested in a legal tech career to pursue business courses that offer insights into the corporate world, unlike the training provided by law schools for ascending law firm ranks.
"You're building from a very traditional professional service, hierarchy, apprentice model that is a law firm into a much more corporate technology environment and if folks are like me coming out of law school, I didn't have a great sense of working in a corporate or startup environment," he said.
To be sure, some law schools are already taking the initiative to prepare their students for the startup world. Last year, Albany Law School brought its students and the SUNY Polytechnic Institute's engineering students together for a program to develop and bring products to market, including the legal and regulatory hurdles.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 2Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 3Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 4Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
- 5Manufacturer Must Provide Details Surrounding Expert’s Livestreamed Inspection, Fed Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250