In what might be a first across the United States, Texas judges on Monday invited a jury pool to a court proceeding over video teleconference.

And they found jury selection unfolded pretty seamlessly over about an hour and a half, with only one hiccup: A juror wandered off screen during a break and couldn't hear the judges calling him back. Senior Judge Keith Dean said it was the digital version of at the courthouse, when court staff occasionally have to track down a juror in the hallway taking a phone call.

As the coronavirus pandemic shuttered courthouses across the nation this spring, Texas emerged as a leader in embracing Zoom video conferences for judges to continue holding court proceedings remotely. Texas judges have already been using the technology for bench trials—but a jury trial is another matter.

'Courthouse has come to you'

Monday's hearing in an insurance dispute was actually a "summary jury trial," which is an alternative dispute resolution process in which the parties participate in a one-day jury trial, followed the next day by a mediation session to attempt to settle the dispute. The jury selection was livestreamed on YouTube, and the rest of the proceeding was private.

"For centuries, if you had jury duty, you have to go to the courthouse. In this case, the courthouse has come to you," said Dean, a senior judge and mediator in the Dallas-Fort Worth region who previously served as judge of the 265th District Court and the Dallas County Criminal Court No. 5.

For the first 30 minutes of the proceeding, 470th District Judge Emily Miskel of Collin County welcomed all of the 26 prospective jurors—another three people failed to report to jury duty—and asked what type of device they were connecting with, and patiently walked them through how to set up their their audio and video correctly.

Miskel, who only participated in the proceeding to handle the technological aspects of the Zoom meeting, added that she appreciated those prospective jurors who had called her office to make sure their jury duty summons was not a scam.

Attorneys Matthew Pearson, founder of Pearson Legal in San Antonio, and senior associate Valerie Cantu, were representing the plaintiff.

"This is as strange for us as it is for you," Pearson told jurors.

Pearson explained that his client, Virtuwave Holdings, owns a building in McKinney that suffered hail damage in March 2017. The company is suing its insurance company, State Farm Lloyds, alleging that it did not pay the benefits that it should have paid. Virtuwave seeks money damages from State Farm, Pearson told jurors during voir dire.

Defense counsel Amy Stewart, partner in Stewart Law Group in Dallas, and associate John Stone represent State Farm.

Stewart said, "How exciting is this that we all get to experience this together for the first time—we know in Texas—but maybe even in the country?"

Approaching the bench

During the jury selection process, the attorneys questioned only 12 prospective jurors at a time. Miskel created a Zoom "breakout room" for the other 14 prospective jurors.

For the first group, the lawyers on both sides went through lists of questions about prospective jurors' views about insurance companies, their personal knowledge of the hail storm in question and more.

Dean then asked the attorneys to approach the bench. How? Miskel created a separate breakout room just for the judge and counsel.

When they came back, a hiccup: One of the prospective jurors had wandered off-screen and could be heard talking on the phone. No response when the judges told him to come back, since his computer audio was hooked into headphones he was not wearing.

Finally, the man returned, and Dean announced that the attorneys for both sides had picked that first group of 12 jurors, which meant the 14 people who had been in a separate breakout room all along were "free to go about your day," Dean said.