Where Legal Ops Pros Say They Face Difficulty in Driving Change
A new webinar from CLOC examined the challenges of trying to drive innovation inside of legal departments and organizations, which can be compounded by a lack of direction and some employees being more willing to embrace change than others.
May 22, 2020 at 10:38 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
A new webinar from the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium engaged in a fair amount of myth-busting on Thursday. "Building the Future of the Legal Function" was part of CLOC's ongoing "Innovation Series," designed to fill the hole in the calendar left by the organization's annual Las Vegas Institute, which was canceled in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Panelists talked for over an hour on the challenges facing legal operations professionals trying to drive change within legal departments and the danger of innovation for the sake of innovation. "Too often it is the case that many movements towards change are led by technology, and that doesn't always make sense to lead with technology as a silver bullet or a push-button solution," said Ed Sohn, a panelist and writer at Above the Law.
So where might legal departments be overestimating the impact of tech? The use of data to push decision-making could be a double-edged sword absent a clear understanding of the variables and context involved. Sohn alluded to a faux belief among legal departments and elsewhere that any conclusions derived from data are true.
Panelist Jason Barnwell, assistant general counsel with modern legal at Microsoft Corp., seconded the potential threat at play. "The thing that we observe about data is that it tends to help you ask better questions, but it is often the case that data doesn't actually answer any questions," Barnwell said.
Panelists applied similar logic to tech in general: Without a bigger picture or strategy in mind, it doesn't really get you anywhere. But to chart a course, legal ops professionals first need to know where their destination lies, which often involves having a very frank discussion with corporate business units about what the organization ultimately defines as a success.
"Without context, without direction, I think what we have is a lack of coherence because as said, tech is not a panacea. It is not a silver bullet. It really is a tool… [Tech] is a means to get you to an outcome," said panelist Jae Um, director of pricing strategy at Baker McKenzie.
When it comes time to actually implement change inside of an organization, that's where the real work begins. Some employees may be more open or receptive than doing things differently than others, but panelists cautioned against some "pockets" of a department to get further ahead than others.
"When you have pockets of excellence and only pockets of excellence, that gets more intense over time because of some of the hardships, the emotional labor that goes into functioning with a different mindset or a different approach than everyone else in your ecosystem," Um said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250