Where Legal Ops Pros Say They Face Difficulty in Driving Change
A new webinar from CLOC examined the challenges of trying to drive innovation inside of legal departments and organizations, which can be compounded by a lack of direction and some employees being more willing to embrace change than others.
May 22, 2020 at 10:38 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
A new webinar from the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium engaged in a fair amount of myth-busting on Thursday. "Building the Future of the Legal Function" was part of CLOC's ongoing "Innovation Series," designed to fill the hole in the calendar left by the organization's annual Las Vegas Institute, which was canceled in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Panelists talked for over an hour on the challenges facing legal operations professionals trying to drive change within legal departments and the danger of innovation for the sake of innovation. "Too often it is the case that many movements towards change are led by technology, and that doesn't always make sense to lead with technology as a silver bullet or a push-button solution," said Ed Sohn, a panelist and writer at Above the Law.
So where might legal departments be overestimating the impact of tech? The use of data to push decision-making could be a double-edged sword absent a clear understanding of the variables and context involved. Sohn alluded to a faux belief among legal departments and elsewhere that any conclusions derived from data are true.
Panelist Jason Barnwell, assistant general counsel with modern legal at Microsoft Corp., seconded the potential threat at play. "The thing that we observe about data is that it tends to help you ask better questions, but it is often the case that data doesn't actually answer any questions," Barnwell said.
Panelists applied similar logic to tech in general: Without a bigger picture or strategy in mind, it doesn't really get you anywhere. But to chart a course, legal ops professionals first need to know where their destination lies, which often involves having a very frank discussion with corporate business units about what the organization ultimately defines as a success.
"Without context, without direction, I think what we have is a lack of coherence because as said, tech is not a panacea. It is not a silver bullet. It really is a tool… [Tech] is a means to get you to an outcome," said panelist Jae Um, director of pricing strategy at Baker McKenzie.
When it comes time to actually implement change inside of an organization, that's where the real work begins. Some employees may be more open or receptive than doing things differently than others, but panelists cautioned against some "pockets" of a department to get further ahead than others.
"When you have pockets of excellence and only pockets of excellence, that gets more intense over time because of some of the hardships, the emotional labor that goes into functioning with a different mindset or a different approach than everyone else in your ecosystem," Um said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250