What's New Now? Tech Helping Firms Keep Pace With Evolving Reopening Mandates
Multiple law firms have invested in back to work information technology, saying it offers the speed and cost-friendliness law firms need to keep clients up-to-date on the evolving shutdown lifts.
May 26, 2020 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
Governments are reopening their states with varying requirements, and law firms view tech-based solutions as their best bet for keeping their clients up-to-date regarding evolving mandates and standards sure to follow.
"In recent weeks what we have anticipated is the need for all clients are probably struggling with a lot of the same challenges, strategically, operationally and legally for planning to reopen," said Akerman partner and Return to Work team leader Beth Alcalde.
In response, Akerman launched its Return to Work Resource Guide, a client-facing web portal containing policies, questionnaires, procedures and other documents to transition workers back to work.
To be sure, some law firms were previously leveraging technology to address COVID-19′s business impact as travel bans and stay-at-home mandates were first issued. At the time, some questioned if the client-facing portals were extremely useful or more so marketing tools.
But Elizabeth Espín Stern, a Mayer Brown partner and member of the firm's COVID-19 global response team, said technology is a useful tool for easily sharing with clients the restrictions of a lifted shutdown and how the mandate impacts their industry.
Mayer Brown previously released Global Traveler Navigator to track travel shutdowns issued by various governments to stem coronavirus spread, and other web tools to assist clients.
The firm followed up Global Traveler Navigator with April's Global Stimulus Navigator, an analysis of major governments' economic stimulus measures, and Back to Business Navigator, an interactive map that illustrates how restrictive state and countywide measures are for specific industries.
Stern noted the Back to Business Navigator was needed to deliver reliable, consistent and "easy-to-digest information to clients, because they were starting to look at multitude of issues."
She also said the firm views governments' reopening mandates as announcements that can be easily revoked if COVID-19 begins to spread in their jurisdiction. As such, a tech platform is a useful tool to keep clients updated as requirements are likely to quickly change.
Kimball Parker, president of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's software developer subsidiary SixFifty, agreed shutdown lifts are evolving rapidly and noted they can also be expensive for companies to understand.
"A company could spend tens of thousands of dollars on an assessment and within a week the policy could be out of date and the assessment is moot based on developments," Parker said. "This is not a situation catered to a static document, and with technology you can update things and blast it to a bunch of users that makes so much sense in this situation."
While SixFifty released two web-based tools to assist companies working during shutdowns, Parker noted the company also recently developed automated assessments and policies for companies bringing employees back to work. Those documents include a return-to-work assessment and policy; a daily employee ready-and-willing to return to work survey; and a daily employee questionnaire to ensure contagious individuals don't come to work.
Though SixFifty leveraged technology and WIlson Sonsini employment lawyers' expertise to develop automated assessments and policies, Parker noted COVID-19 is an unprecedented event that no company or its lawyers can compare to.
"This has never happened before, and so what that means is the attorney has to generate that document from scratch and that dramatically increases the cost as opposed to working from a template. That makes it really expensive," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250