Africa's Lack of Data Protection Has Created Deep Vulnerabilities. But Is Change On The Way?
The COVID-19 crisis has created an urgency around the need for long-absent cyber laws across the continent.
May 27, 2020 at 10:54 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com International
Fewer than half of the 54 countries in Africa have any form of data protection legislation in place, according to lawyers with knowledge of the matter.
"Only nine African countries have data protection legislation and another 22 have draft regulations pending," says Bob Kayihura, of counsel at Covington & Burling in South Africa.
Despite the African Union encouraging the adoption of data protection and privacy laws across the continent, it has been a slow process, says Nozipho Mngomezulu, partner at Webber Wentzel.
"Even in South Africa, only parts of the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPI Act), which came into effect 13 years ago, have been implemented."
Now, individuals working from home due to the COVID-19 crisis has opened up new vulnerabilities for cyber criminals to exploit, she added.
"An increasing number of companies are asking for advice about their systems being compromised."
But with a dawning continent-wide initiative soon to take effect, and COVID-19 heightening the need for better and safer communications, there is a renewed urgency around the issue.
So far, however, solutions have been piecemeal and controversial, with little legal underpinning.
The practice of African governments using biometrics to gather data from citizens, for example for issuing identity cards, is a threat to personal privacy, says Ahmore Burger-Smidt, director at South African firm Werksmans Attorneys.
"How can individuals check what data is being stored on them and whether it is being stored safely?"
The AU has issued model legislation for data protection and cybercrime, but it is already out of date, because it is taking so long to implement, she added. Further, gaps in and misalignments of legislation creates a grey area for multinationals looking to invest in Africa, adds Burger-Smidt.
"It is dealt with through commitments to contract into European legislation, although this can delay transactions."
Ridwaan Boda, director of technology, media and telecommunication at ENSafrica says the lack of awareness of the vulnerability of data is concerning, as the percentage of the population using smartphones to access the internet is increasing daily.
Lack of data protection laws enables multinationals to access individuals' data more freely than in developed markets, "for example to monitor their use of technologies," says Grant Williams, partner at Eversheds Sutherland's Johannesburg office.
Those working with governments through public/private partnerships can also gain access to all sorts of data, he added.
|A Change on the Way?
The impetus for change appears to be increasing, not least by way of an ambitious plan to create a single digital economy in Africa by 2030, Covington's Kayihura says.
"This includes building technology platforms that can track goods and services and exchange data securely."
The aim of the Digital Economy Initiative for Africa – tabled by the African Union – is to ensure that every individual, business and government on the continent will be digitally enabled by 2030. The World Bank estimates that the initiative will cost a total of $100 billion, towards which it has pledged to invest $25 billion between now and 2030.
Ever since the first new generation undersea optic fiber cable landed in Africa in 2009, the concept of a digital economy has been promoted under the banner of the need for 'universal access to broadband connectivity' on the continent. Optimists suggest this is the catalyst for change in a continent in desperate need of a coherent set of cyber laws and regulations.
This month, Zimbabwe introduced its Cyber Security and Data Protection Bill, according to Nellie Tiyago, partner at Harare based Scanlen & Holderness.
"Having been suddenly cut off from the world as borders closed around it due to the COVID-19 lockdown, the government realised that the country cannot operate as a village."
One of the challenges to achieving uniform laws is that the African continent is divided, particularly in terms of language.
"Countries like Zimbabwe that were colonised by the British and Portuguese tend to follow similar legal processes," says Tiyago.
Cameroon, in central Africa, adopted cybercrime legislation in 2010, but has yet to introduce a specific data protection law, says Danielle Moukouri, managing partner at D.Moukouri and partners, in the city of Douala.
"It is challenging for users to control the use of their data," she says.
But not all action has been slow. ENSafrica's Boda says businesses and governments are adopting artificial intelligence codes of practice, with the primary focus being data protection and privacy.
Still, there is a danger that the need for regulations are being undermined by ambitious plans to adopt new tech, seemingly at any cost. Alice Namuli Blazevic, partner at Katende Ssempebwa Advocates in Kampala, says while businesses are adopting AI and Blockchain technologies, many are oblivious to their data vulnerabilities.
Some nations, however, have working legislation in place, that other countries would do well to take heed of. For example, the Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act, 2019 regulates the processing of personal information and its Computer Misuse Act is used to combat cybercrime.
"If companies are found to have cybercrime breaches they have not reported, the fine is 2% of their annual revenue," Blazevic says.
|
Read more
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250