As Bankruptcies Grow, E-Discovery Counsels' Work May Become More Challenging
E-discovery lawyers caution that, while the discovery process is similar across any litigation, bankruptcy proceedings require quicker turnarounds and more challenging data handling procedures.
May 27, 2020 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
Businesses reeling after multiple international stay-at-home mandates are finding themselves out of options and filing for bankruptcy. The situation has led some law firms to cash in on bankruptcy service, and made many cautiously optimistic that the bankruptcy practice will be in high-demand during the current recession.
If it comes to fruition, a boom in bankruptcy proceedings could impact e-discovery counsel's workload as well. "If you have an uptick in bankruptcies, especially corporate bankruptcies, you will have a correlated uptick in e-discovery expertise," said Shannon Capone Kirk, Ropes & Gray's e-discovery counsel. "I think that's a fair projection to make."
Kirk's projection is based on the growing amount of digital communications that occur across companies. "We have seen in recent years an increase in the volume and nature of electronic discovery in restructuring proceedings," said Christine Payne, a partner at e-discovery boutique Redgrave, which last week announced a restructuring discovery team. "Not every restructuring is going to have discovery but those that do, it moves very fast and the data types are becoming increasingly complex. Parties are more interested in text messages and we have to keep up."
Suffice to say, the demands of collecting and reviewing all electronic data during a bankruptcy proceeding can be challenging.
"You have the accelerated pace for discovery in bankruptcy, [so] you have to have a good knowledge about the efficient technology and efficient workflows" she said. While not all bankruptcies entail a quick turnaround for discovery, "often [there's] a need to resolve the issue as soon as possible so creditors can be paid and resolution can be had," Kirk explained.
E-discovery conducted during a bankruptcy proceeding can also include unique data collection and privacy demands.
During Chapter 7, for example, collecting computers from departing employees should include recovering encryption keys, because once people leave it may be difficult to access data, noted Littler Mendelson shareholder and national e-discovery counsel Paul Weiner.
While Chapter 7 liquidation places a stronger emphasis on collecting data, Payne noted that Chapter 11 restructuring typically entails obtaining C-suite communications and assessing messages. "Restructuring discovery is mostly done by agreements and parties are incentivized to produce comprehensively and quickly. If the merits counsel [is] negotiating on behalf of a debtor and agrees to give officer-level communication, you have to be able to jump on it."
Still while they have their own unique challenges, e-discovery during bankruptcy proceedings also can be similar to other litigation, e-discovery counsel said. After all, understanding the scope, what's is needed and other rules agreed upon by the parties are essential for all discovery matters, including bankruptcy proceedings.
It's only bankruptcies' heightened timeline and unique collection challenges that really make the difference, Weiner explained.
"The fundamental issues that would come up in litigation will also arise in those [bankruptcy] cases but, because of the unique setting of bankruptcy, when things may be winding down, reorganizing or changing, those are when the unique circumstances come in," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Consumer Protection Suit Cleared to Go Forward Against Irritating Eye Serum
- 2COVID-19 Was Still Relevant in Securities Class Actions During 2024, Report Says
- 3After Botched Landing of United Airlines Boeing 767, Unlikely Plaintiff Sues Carrier
- 4DOT Moves to Roll Back Emissions Rules, Eliminate DEI Programs
- 5No Injury: Despite Proven Claims, Antitrust Suit Fails
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250