Absent In-Person Meetings, Legal Tech Providers Still Seek Personal Touch
Remote working and economic uncertainty caused legal tech vendors to adjust their sales tactics to a more personal, consultative approach. But some wonder if it's enough to compensate for a lack of face-to-face interactions.
May 28, 2020 at 01:27 PM
3 minute read
With in-person meetings ruled out, legal tech companies have adjusted their sales tactics to a more personal, albeit digitally conveyed, approach.
The unique circumstances of COVID-19 caused legal tech vendors to embrace more creative, and less straightforward, sales tactics, said Kenneth Gary, a partner at legal tech PR and crisis communications firm Baretz+Brunelle.
"[Vendors are] just communicating more and some are reallocating to more public relations and content to rise above the hard sale approach to a more consultative approach, which has been helpful," he said.
While companies contacted by Legaltech News didn't report a slump in sales, most said they stopped cold-calling as clients adjusted to remotely working and dealt with the personal impacts of COVID-19.
"We shared more of the information through the content leadership sales method because we wanted to provide information to clients and prospective clients, but we didn't want to call because it's tone-deaf," said Jerry Ting, co-founder and CEO of contract management platform Evisort.
Evisort also launched webinars and leveraged video conferencing platforms to build relationships and add a personal touch to sales call, Ting added.
Likewise, ProSearch Strategies paused its cold-calling and began deploying webinars, said the company's sales and marketing director, Brian Meegan. He also noted the e-discovery provider's new sales tactics included more sensitivity toward current or prospective clients.
"There are a lot of people going through this that have relatives that are ill or have been ill, and just having conversations and making sure everything is OK is where our approach has changed," he said.
Still, while Evisort and ProSearch's pause on cold-calling and shifting to a web-based outreach approach is one of necessity, its effectiveness is questionable, Gary noted.
"Legal tech is one industry that has thrived from event-focused selling—everything from Legalweek to ILTACON, CLOC and other majority legal tech-focused events. Without that, you're seeing legal tech companies turning to virtual events, as we are seeing across industries. However, virtual events are untested," he added.
Noting the importance of body language and face-to-face interactions in sales, Gary said he wasn't sure if digital platforms were sufficient. ProSearch's Meegan also questioned if the new approaches could nurture the business development vendors need.
"I don't know if you can start that process through cold-calling someone brand new and build that relationship in any industry. I don't know how you build that relationship with business collaboration tools without being shoulder-to-shoulder to them."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250