Learning Disrupted: Virtual Law Programs Come With Their Set of Problems
As law school summer associate programs, internships and externships go remote, law schools say their students faces hurdles in their learning experience.
May 29, 2020 at 02:00 PM
4 minute read
Law school students were abruptly thrown into remote learning earlier this year to avoid the spread of coronavirus, and most can expect a telecommuting experience while summer interning at law firms, government agencies and other legal organizations.
"All of our students have been working remotely," said Susan Brooks, associate dean for experiential learning at Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law. "There may be some attorneys that are going into their law offices, but I'm not aware of any law students. All their work this summer is happening remotely."
Indeed, while some law firms have cut summer associate programs, many have launched remote programs or developed simulated experiences. Law schools are also stepping up and creating opportunities for their students, including the University of Illinois at Chicago John Marshall Law School and New York Law School recently kicking off simulated summer associate experiences.
Law school students can get the work done remotely, but telecommuting presents some hurdles for students to have a worthwhile experience. Law schools warn students and their supervising attorneys must persistently initiate conversations that exposes the student to the inner workings of the organization and provides the student with networking opportunities.
While some tasks, including legal research, aren't hindered by telecommuting, other opportunities are nonexistent or difficult to accomplish when working remotely, Brooks explained.
"There are probably more students that are having this opportunity to do in-depth research as one of the side effects to doing their work virtually, as opposed to working in-person. They would probably do some research but other things, right now aren't realistic for them to do," she said.
Students likely lost the spontaneity of sitting in on a client meeting or court proceeding while working remotely, Brooks added. "We are trying to support supervisors to create those opportunities for meetings and check-ins, but it certainly is going to be more formalized and planned out compared to if the student was in the office."
However, persistent communication can break telecommuting's barriers and ensure students are exposed to all facets of the organization, law schools said.
Georgia Latino Law Foundation president Ana Maria Martinez hopes to create a remote interning experience that includes more than conducting research, but also sparks networking opportunities and exposes students to the inner workings of a professional legal environment.
Set to start June 1, Martinez launched a virtual internship pairing 2L law students with Georgia judges "specifically designed as a hybrid mentorship and interning opportunity," she said.
To create a worthwhile experience, students and supervising attorneys most thoroughly communicate expectations and have non-project-related discussions, Martinez said.
"One of the things we recommend for the students and judges to do is have one check-in call weekly, ideally more often than that," Martinez said. "With the main supervisors they should have one or two touch points to discuss the work and provide a first base for chitchat, figure out what people are working on and what are the challenges. That's the biggest issue of remote internships is you don't get to get to know each other and chitchat."
Florida A&M University College of Law interim director of legal clinic and field placement Kim Crag-Chaderton stressed communication is essential while interning remotely and students should schedule at least weekly calls with their supervising attorney to ensure their progress matches their initial goal.
Additionally, thoroughly explaining what research sources and books are needed for a project can improve a student's experience, Martinez said.
"I think the hardest part in this is when law students aren't there in-person they miss the opportunity to see how things progress. With having those conversations out loud, 'This is what we expect you to use [for research].' It will make them feel empowered to do a good job."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250