Looming Deadline, Financial Complexity Makes LIBOR Ripe for Tech-Lawyer Partnerships
Having to transition from LIBOR, which will potentially require numerous contract revisions and negotiations, can be significantly more complicated than meeting other regulatory demands, such as the GDPR or CCPA.
June 01, 2020 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
The London Interbank Offered Rate is found in hundreds of thousands of financial contracts with an estimated $200 trillion value. But by Jan. 1, 2022, LIBOR must be replaced with another benchmark rate.
If recent COVID-19 events have some financial institutions waiting for an extension, the U.K.'s Financial Conduct Authority recently stomped out those dreams when the regulator announced it wouldn't adjust the deadline in light of the pandemic.
With no flexibility in sight, lawyers say clients have to start the transitioning process by leveraging not only lawyers' legal expertise, but also appropriate technology.
"We saw a real opportunity for technology to help our clients transition from LIBOR in an efficient way," said McGuireWoods partner Clayton Stallbaumer. "The problem they have is it's a volume and timing issue. We're roughly 18 months from LIBOR going away, and a lot of our institutional clients have thousands of documents that reference LIBOR. As we were talking to clients about this, there seems to be a real opportunity to use certain types of technology."
Some of technology needed can include data analysis, contract review, template automation and mass email notification tools.
To be sure, lawyers note LIBOR is a complex regulatory shift unlike the General Data Protection Regulation, California Consumer Privacy Act and other recent regulations.
"I think in terms of the numbers of project-type work [that] banks have had to do over the past five years or so … the GDPR and Brexit, those types of projects have been relatively legal light touches," said Dentons partner and derivatives practice member Luke Whitmore.
However, transitioning away from LIBOR, which includes adding contract provisions and renegotiating rates, requires significant heavy lifting, notes Joyce Xu, who leads Paul Hastings' global derivatives practice and global LIBOR transition task force.
"We've talked with AI and legal tech providers, and we've licensed our own software that helps with the initial review that references LIBOR," she said. "And I think pretty much all of our clients that have significant books with contracts are looking to utilize AI technology to help them initially identify the universe of contracts."
Law firms are also taking the initiative and partnering with legal tech providers to assist the LIBOR transition, including Mayer Brown, which on May 21 announced such a partnership with legal and compliance provider Morae.
When asked how technology can expedite the transition process, Mayer Brown partner and LIBOR transition leader Paul Forrester noted that tools can quickly analyze data based on the lawyers' classifications and automate the assignment of amended contract templates. Additionally, he said software can also email contract readjustment notifications to third parties. He explained that all of these are efficiencies that law firms need to harness to assist clients during particularly laborious matters.
"A lot of companies that need that additionally help, there's a real efficiency with having the collaboration," Forrester said. "It's not going to be for everyone, but I do think more firms should be more open than what they have been historically with that collaboration."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250