Strengthening Diversity & Inclusion in E-Discovery in a Post-Pandemic World
The COVID-19 pandemic creates opportunities for the e-discovery industry, like the law and technology industries, to expand its engagement and retention of diverse talent. Here are some actions that can be taken today.
June 02, 2020 at 07:00 AM
9 minute read
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) sent shockwaves throughout the world and affected every industry. While we continue learning about various aspects of the virus and grappling with the resulting "new normal," the e-discovery industry has an opportunity to strengthen its diversity and inclusion objectives and ensure they remain a strategic business priority.
Recent business disruptions underscore that law firms, legal departments and e-discovery service providers need top-performing talent in order to recover—and successfully move beyond—current circumstances into a future ripe with unimaginable possibilities. Is your team ready for that future? Making quality staffing decisions now is vital to supporting your organization's goals of creating new, or refining existing, products and services to appeal to a larger group of customers.
Let's face it, every organization needs to make itself more appealing to clients, customers, and communities in order to expand business opportunities and to do so rapidly when the opportunity to safely re-open emerges. A critical component of any post-pandemic business strategy is attracting and retaining diverse talent possessing the skills necessary to expand market share. Talent able to connect meaningfully and respectfully with customers' cultures, values, and other diversity dimensions will drive business successes and should remain a top priority.
Lack of investment in quality diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts plagues many industries and professions, and e-discovery is not immune. Decision makers failing to consider racial or ethnic minorities, women, and LGBTQ+ individuals for meaningful work assignments, valuable networking and client interaction opportunities, mentoring and sponsorship, and training necessarily limit hiring, promotion, and leadership advancement opportunities. More significantly, such deficiencies in investment often steer diverse talent—voluntarily or involuntarily—out the door.
The State of Diversity in Law and Technology
While there are no comprehensive studies or surveys of diversity and inclusion in e-discovery, this industry lies at the intersection of law and technology—both of which struggle to achieve and/or maintain diverse and inclusive workforces. Examining diversity within these two fields can help organizations understand the state of diversity in e-discovery.
Even though the number of women enrolled in law school has surpassed the number of men since 2016, and were nearly on par in several preceding years, women comprise only 23% of law firm partners and 45% of law firm associates. Among all U.S. companies, women represent only 31% of all general counsel and men more than double that percentage (69%).
Unfortunately, the numbers are even worse for racial and ethnically diverse attorneys. According to the American Bar Association, in the 10 years following the onset of the previous economic downturn, from 2008 to 2018:
- The percentage of Native American attorneys remained unchanged at only 1% of all lawyers;
- African American attorneys increased by a mere 0.4%, representing 5% of all attorneys though accounting for 13.4% of the U.S. population;
- Asian-Americans are 3% of all attorneys but comprise 5.9% of the total U.S. population;
- Latinx attorneys are a mere 5% of all attorneys, but 18.3% of the U.S. population; and
- Hawaiian/Pacific Islander attorneys decreased by 0.4%, and constitute less than 1% of all lawyers in the U.S. for seven of the 10-year period.
Even within ethnic and gender groups, diversity data can be startling. For example in 2018, minority women were just 13.52% of all U.S. law firm associates and only 3.19% of law firm partners. Likewise, minority men accounted for fewer than 11% of all associates and 5.94% of partners at U.S. law firms. Meanwhile, the data shows that Caucasian women in the partner ranks have made consistent advances during this same time period with their numbers increasing from 17% to 20% of all law firm partners. Representation of minority women and men continues to lag in the legal field, particularly for Latina and African American women who represent only 2.45% and 2.55% of law firm associates and 0.77% and 0.68% of law firm partners, respectively.
(Note: The surveys referenced in this article define racial and ethnic groups in a number of ways; however, for purposes of consistency, this article uses the following categories: Caucasian, African American, Asian-American, Latinx, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and Native American.)
In addition, while the percentage of LGBTQ+ lawyers has generally trended upward, lawyers self-identifying as LGBTQ+ are fewer than 3% of all lawyers in the U.S., and only 2.1% of all law firm partners.
Similar to the legal industry, the technology industry also struggles with hiring and retaining employees from underrepresented diverse backgrounds. In the U.S., Caucasians are the overwhelming majority of the technology workforce and, according to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, represent 83.3% of all tech executives and 68% of tech professionals (e.g., computer programmers, software developers, web developers, and database administrators). Conversely, minority group representation is significantly lower for both executives and professionals: Asian-Americans represent 10.6% of tech executives and 19.5% of professionals, African Americans are fewer than 2% of executives and 5.27% of professionals, and Latinxs comprise 3.1% of executives and 5.3% of professionals.
Women have not fared much better. The percentage of women technologists has declined from 32% in 1990 to 20% in 2018, while in 2018 women were 50.8% of the total U.S. population. For minority women, the numbers tell an even bleaker story—Latinas and African-American women comprise only 1% and 3% of the technology workforce, respectively.
Improving Diversity and Inclusion in Difficult Times
E-discovery occupies a critical space at the intersection of the technology and legal industries. While COVID-19 has disrupted business, e-discovery professionals have a tremendous opportunity right now to transform the way they conceptualize and deliver e-discovery offerings around the globe and strengthen client relationships.
Any vision for e-discovery in the post-pandemic world must recognize the critical importance of the contributions of diverse talent to innovation and to the success of every corporate legal department, law firm, and e-discovery service provider. There are significant opportunities in this moment to develop and execute impactful diversity and inclusion priorities. To achieve these priorities, the e-discovery industry should take the following actions.
Adopt strategies preventing traditionally under-represented groups from being disproportionately impacted by pay cuts and layoffs. The lesson from the 2008 recession is clear—women and/or minority attorneys experienced unprecedented job losses and compensation reductions as a result of the employment decisions made during that time. Those decisions resulted in a years-long decline in the percentage of women attorneys and the number of African-American associates dropped every year between 2009 and 2018, except for a small increase in 2016. In fact, the percentage of African American female associates in law firms remained below the pre-recession percentages in the 10 years following the onset of that recession. The goal in this pandemic is to make quality staffing and compensation decisions that do not disproportionately affect diverse lawyers and practitioners.
Enhance mentoring and communication skills with diverse talent. Now is the time to employ "best practices" for engaging with and advancing the careers of diverse talent. This is an optimal time for enhancing or developing new e-discovery products and services, and re-thinking how to deliver them to various customers. Consider whether critical information about these career-enhancing opportunities and projects is flowing to all members of the team. It is important to share those opportunities with the full team in order to invest in your team's collective success. Improving communication skills also allows a leader to gather key insights that will improve the team's overall functioning and help diverse talent feel connected, valued, and included.
Use data to assess and enhance diversity and inclusion efforts. Organizations should consider collecting and analyzing (in legally compliant and appropriate ways) diversity, equity, and inclusion metrics identifying opportunities to enhance successes in recruiting, retaining, and promoting diverse e-discovery talent. This is also an ideal time to assess whether business relationships with LGBTQ+, minority, and women-owned businesses could be useful in expanding market share while also demonstrating a commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion values.
Support e-discovery industry initiatives designed to improve diversity and inclusion in the profession. E-discovery service providers, law firms, and corporate legal departments have numerous opportunities to participate in industry-specific diversity and inclusion initiatives where invaluable "best practices" information is shared. The Sedona Conference, for example, created the All-Sedona Diversity Committee to improve diversity within the organization and the larger legal community. Additionally, the Working Group Series' meetings and annual The Sedona Conference Institute have featured panels that provide thought-provoking insights about some of the thornier issues affecting diversity and inclusion in e-discovery. The E-Discovery Institute (EDI) also expresses its commitment to fostering diversity in the e-discovery community through the EDI Diversity Initiative, where signatories pledge to increase diversity within their respective organizations and to consider service providers' workforce diversity when placing business.
The COVID-19 pandemic creates opportunities for the e-discovery industry, like the law and technology industries, to expand its engagement and retention of diverse talent. The decisions made today about the workforce of the future should reflect its commitment to diversity and inclusion.
Dionysia Johnson-Massie, Esq. is a highly skilled employment litigator with extensive experience partnering with business leaders to address employment matters impacting the workplace and advising on diversity, equity, and inclusion business strategies. She is a shareholder with Littler Mendelson, P.C. in Atlanta, Georgia, and co-founder of Littler's Bollo Affinity Group.
Kimberly J. Duplechain, Esq. provides advice and counsel to national and international companies on e-discovery practices to ensure defensible, efficient, and cost-effective strategies for complex electronic discovery matters. She is an associate and e-discovery Counsel with Littler Mendelson, P.C. in Washington, D.C., and a member of Littler's Bollo Affinity Group.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 2Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 3Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 4Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 5Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250