Singapore's Intelllex Raises $2.1M to Expand Knowledge Platform
Following participation in Thomson Reuters and Barclays incubators, Intelllex is taking its practice area-specific focus and looking to build out its knowledge management platform and business development capabilities.
June 03, 2020 at 04:59 PM
4 minute read
In a sign of the Asian legal tech market's recent growth, knowledge management company Intelllex on Wednesday announced it has raised USD $2.1 million to support its international growth. The round is led by Quest Ventures, with participation from Thomson Reuters, Insignia Ventures, K3 Ventures and a Singaporean government-backed fund.
Speaking with Legaltech News earlier this week, Intelllex co-founder and co-CEO Chang Zi Qian said the startup company's new funding will largely be used for engineering and development of its core knowledge management product, as well as business development in particular practice areas, such as financial services and listed companies. Currently with offices in Singapore and the U.K., Intelllex also has its eye on international expansion, with Hong Kong next on its list.
Intelllex focuses its attention on larger law firms, corporate clients and regulators; Chang noted his team usually works with internal innovation teams and knowledge management teams. With that in mind, it's no surprise that international firms are Intelllex's most common clients, along with larger regulatory bodies.
The platform itself looks to differentiate itself from competitors through the tight integration of legal concepts and uploaded documents to the system, marrying the capabilities of document management with specialized legal research capabilities. In particular, it looks to focus its tagging and training system by practice area rather than firm- or company-wide, in order to better adopt to those more specific nuances of practicing.
Chang told LTN that he equates the process of law to a person, made up of interconnected components. "Cases are delivered from legislation, they're connected. Legislation is connected to regulation. Legal documents make references to these sources of law, they're also regulated and make references to one another. They're all connected. Therefore, what we're trying to do here is match up the law as the foundation of technology with the man, who establishes the relationship between words, between concepts."
Intelllex works by separating documents in its system, whether directly uploaded or integrated with outside DMSs or systems like SharePoint, into configurable "stacks." When a document enters the system, the proprietary AI platform works to determine the legal topic at hand, the type of document (case filing, affidavit, deposition, etc.), and the legal question or issue contained within. The system also performs OCR as needed, then automatically tags the document based on a taxonomy that is either Intelllex's preset or configured by the customer.
From there, users search for topics based on those legal topics, questions or by type of document. When applicable, the search results given contain the legal topics present in the document, the tags applied to the result, as well as summarization of what the document is about. These results can be analyzed via a list view, or a visualization map that connects given topics to one another.
Chang noted that this additional information is what separates a KM system like Intelllex from document management, which he described as more akin to a warehouse that has a bit of everything, but trying to find something can be difficult. "What we want with a knowledge management system is to be more like a library, not a warehouse. In a library, things are categorized with certain knowledge dimensions, because of the models lawyers have when they retrieve documents."
Intelllex's growth was spurred through participation in multiple incubators such as Thomson Reuters' Labs Incubator and Barclays Bank's LawTech Incubator (Eagle Labs). But although Chang called the current state of Asian legal tech market nascent, he pointed to other funding in the region such as Chinese KM company Powerlaw.ai's deal with Sequoia as evidence that investors are beginning to pay more attention. And he hopes that investments such as the one Intelllex has received spurs even more investment and growth.
"We hope that our funding round will give some confidence for the space that we operate in, and hopefully more startups will join us in this space to unlock the innovation required," he explained. "We really think it takes an equal system of startups and technologies for this to work, and I hope that we can bring together more people and give investors confidence."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250