Legal, Fintech Collaborations Point to Future for Highly Specialized Partnerships
Dentons announced it was partnering with process management provider eClerx Market, an arrangement that could be more common as tech and process challenges become more specialized across industries.
June 09, 2020 at 01:30 PM
3 minute read
Two heads are better than one—a sentiment that may doubly apply to the combination of legal and technology needs that are continuing to arise in the financial services industry. But the variety of institutional knowledge and process-oriented skills required to solve challenges facing the financial industry may be too great for firms, even ones developing innovative technology, to handle alone.
Case in point: Last week, Dentons and business process management provider eClerx Markets announced they were entering into a partnership that would combine the law firm's legal expertise with eClerx's technology to meet financial services client needs around data extraction, document digitization, document negotiation, customer outreach and legal expertise.
But with both Dentons and its collaborative innovation arm NextLaw Labs no stranger to technology, why seek an outside partnership? Luke Whitmore, a partner at Dentons, indicated that there are some tasks or skills related to finance that don't lend themselves to the talent traditionally found inside firms, such as generating multiple contracts very quickly, distributing large volumes of email or generating highly detailed trade transaction reports.
Attempting to solve the problem by simply bringing technology in-house isn't always effective, largely because the internal skill gap around how to successfully operate such products continues to persist. "I think one of the mistakes that law firms have made over the last five years is being very keen on buying tech, but then not actually being able to adapt and flex that technology to meet the kind of precise requirements of a particular client," Whitmore said.
He argued that specialized providers can respond to client needs around tasks like data extraction in a more efficient and cost-friendly manner. E-Clerx, for example, can automate the process of finding specific clauses inside contracts and then mining the relevant data points.
To be sure, process management companies in the financial services market also have something to gain by allying themselves with a law firm.
Bhavin Patel, associate principal at eClerx, noted that experienced attorneys familiar with the regulatory landscape can help construct the legal framework or structure by which a problem needs to be solved, while technology is the mechanism by which that design is executed.
"There's lots of great tools out there and lots of great technologies. I think the problem that a lot of fintechs have is they don't necessarily have the legal expertise to solve the problem front to back. And so I think partnerships like this help solve that issue," Patel said.
Those partnerships don't necessarily have to be limited to financial services. Whitmore at Dentons believes the amount of regulatory change the financial sector has experienced over the last decade made it a natural starting point for legal and tech collaboration as institutions looked to tackle challenges like LIBOR.
But similar regulatory challenges stemming from the likes of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Brexit could lead to more law firm collaborations with outside process management providers down the road if attorneys can get over their initial skittishness.
"I guess there's probably still some nervousness probably in the larger law firms to partner up. Maybe they think that they are giving away house secrets," Whitmore said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250