A Post-COVID-19 Legal Bot Boom? Don't Bet on It
Wilson Sonsini's summer associates will be given the opportunity to try and automate select legal processes, but law firms in general may have a lot of work to do before their bots can be client-facing.
June 10, 2020 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
For the second year in row, summer associates at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati will have the option of engaging in a Build a Bot initiative that allows them to take a crack at automating the legal function of their choice.
In some ways, the program is already the perfect fit for the firm's first completely virtual summer program. But whether it's also symptomatic of a new urgency surrounding law firms and their use of bots that automate tasks remains to be seen.
To be sure, many firms have had to endure furloughs and layoffs over the last several months to cope with the economic fallout of nationwide business shutdowns. Automating responses to basic client inquiries or other low-value work could help lighten the load on remaining staff.
However, David Wang, chief innovation officer at Wilson Sonsini, believes bot adoption will ultimately be driven not by personnel shortages, but continuing pressure to drive efficiency. "I do think that there probably will be long-term trends in the industry that, for lack of a better word, push firms to better understand this area, because ultimately they need to become more efficient in order to compete in the market," Wang said.
The motivation behind the firm's own Build a Bot initiative revolves around the desire to put a tool in the hands of associates, partners and paralegals that would allow them to automate processes in a more distributed way, spanning both varying levels of expertise and multiple practice groups. Summer associates are given the choice between completing a standard-issue writing sample such as a brief or selecting a document-based legal process to serve as the basis for a bot constructed on Documate's platform.
Wang compared the initiative to a research and development lab. For example, last year a group in the summer program attempted to automate an M&A terms sheet, which proved too ambitious of an undertaking. Instead, this summer's projects will include automated processes around nondisclosure agreements and service provider terminations.
"We're using the summer labor to do the testing instead of the more productive associate time," Wang said.
But while Wilson Sonsini may be exploring automation and bots, are other firms? To be sure, there were already a few. Last November, Clifford Chance launched an Automation Academy in Singapore geared toward instructing lawyers how to automate tasks such as contract drafting. Meanwhile, Baker & Hostetler has developed a bankruptcy bot to help field general bankruptcy questions pertaining to rules and client pricing.
Fallout from the pandemic may have opened up even more dimensions for firms curious about deploying bots or automated documents. Dorna Moini, CEO and founder of Documate, the document automation platform that Wilson Sonsini's summer associates will use to build their bots, indicated that the platform has seen an uptick in interest from large firms over the last few months.
"Several of them have come to us specifically to build COVID-19 response tools and then as a result have realized that [automation] can be applied more broadly within their practices," she said.
As for whether furloughs or layoffs could bolster the adoption of bots inside law offices, the answer may be entirely dependent on the size of the firm in question. Moini believes reduced staff levels could definitely be a factor at small or medium-sized firms. But larger law practices may be more focused on the next stage of their evolution, which includes a heavier emphasis on client-facing bots that cut down on the low-value work juggled by employees still on the payroll.
Moini called the internal-facing bots and automated documents that firms are deploying the "baby step" toward applications that can interact directly with clients. "I think it's going to be a bit of a transition," she said.
Such a transition will likely require the right blend of legal and technological insight. Wang at Wilson Sonsini pointed out that summer associates will need more than just technical knowledge to excel at building bots. It's difficult to successfully automate a nondisclosure agreement if you don't know much about how those deals are structured.
"You really need to have a deep understanding of the process from end-to-end because you need to account for all of those things," Wang said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250