Lex Machina Releases App to Track COVID-19's Litigation Impact
The COVID-19 Impact Analyzer provides data regarding the total case filings, including new filings by practice area, and total complaints that mention COVID-19 or related terms.
June 16, 2020 at 10:01 AM
4 minute read
From Feb. 24 to March 1, only three federal court complaints mentioned COVID-19. But by the week of May 24 through May 31, as more states relaxed their lockdown requirements, that number jumped to 148. Sound interesting? One company is betting it's more than than just a number.
Today, Lex Machina's Legal Analytics platform launched its web browser-based COVID-19 Impact Analyzer App, a weekly updated program that highlights coronavirus-related filings and outcomes in U.S. federal courts.
To be sure, Legal Analytics is no stranger to in-depth analytics regarding federal court rulings and decisions. It's even beginning to extend its analytics to state courts. But the COVID app is unique in specifically examining the coronavirus' impact on the federal courts beginning the week of Feb. 24.
Lex Machina director of product management Carla Rydholm said the app was developed because they were fielding many questions regarding COVID-19, including if court proceedings were slowing down and what type of cases were being filed.
What It Is: Each Monday, the app is set to release a week's worth of data concerning federal court filings and findings, Rydholm explained.
Users click a week, such as May 18-24, and a chart is shown that includes total case filings in federal courts, except prisoner rights and Social Security matters, according to a demo shown to Legaltech News. Total case filings are also compared with previous years. Likewise, users can also contrast the amount of filings in a specific practice area to filings made in previous years.
For further insights, COVID app users can view how many trials, judgment rulings were made during any week post-shutdown, and view new complaints that mention COVID-19. All of the described elements are available to the public and current Legal Analytics customers for free, Rydholm said.
However, access to the "underlying cases," such as the court documents, aren't available in the public version. Instead, paid access to Lex Machina, which is owned by LexisNexis, is required to access court documents.
Lex Machina decided to release a publicly available version to allow anyone interested to review how the pandemic is impacting federal courts, Rydholm explained.
Rydholm noted the app can be helpful to any practitioner that wants to keep up with what's happening, with real data. She added that it's also a valuable tool for lawyers counseling their clients about trends in the court system.
Competition: The COVID-19 app joins a growing pool of court research tools, including Casetext, ROSS and even other LexisNexis products such as judge-analytics platform Context and Lexis Analytics.
However, while lawyers can check court analytics sites daily or schedule alert notifications regarding filings, Rydholm views the COVID-19 app as unique in that it's a weekly update and provides a snapshot of COVID-19 activities. "The idea with the app is it's easy, it's efficient and you can check in with those snapshots," she said.
A Long Shelf Life: To be sure, some legal tech observers have questioned the viability of some coronavirus-centric legal tech. But Lex Machina foresees a lengthy need for analytics concerning COVID-19-related litigation as it winds through the U.S. judicial system.
"We're expecting the app to evolve. Some of the litigation being filed now that have a keyword matching COVID-19 will play out in the courts for a while," Rydholm said.
While it may take some time for certain practice areas to be impacted by coronavirus shutdowns, lawyers' and the public's interest won't dissipate anytime soon, Rydholm added.
"Major issues occur like a hurricane or a big oil spill, but we've never seen something major happen at the scale of COVID-19," she explained. "There's interest to see how that affects societies and plays out in the courts."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250