The Few Who Didn't Shut Down: Managing a Law Firm During COVID-19
While seven states didn't issue stay-at-home mandates, many law firms in those areas still followed others around the country in requiring remote work.
June 24, 2020 at 12:00 PM
3 minute read
Without a federal COVID-19 directive, states implemented their own varying shelter-in-place mandates during the early days of the pandemic. But while the majority of states enacted shutdowns to offset growing coronavirus infections, seven states didn't issue orders barring residents from nonessential activities.
Still, despite not having official stay-at-home orders, most law firms in Arkansas, Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming mirrored their colleagues across the country by working remotely to protect against potential coronavirus exposure.
To be sure, of those seven states, South Dakota was the only one that didn't require any businesses to close. But law firms that could work from home took the opportunity to do so, said Ballard Spahr's Sioux Falls, South Dakota, office managing partner Amy Arndt.
"For most legal firms in this area, there was a period of stay-at-home policies in place," she said. "Our firm is still working remotely in Sioux Falls and we've just started a phase one return-from-home policy."
Since mid-March, Ballard Spahr's Sioux Falls lawyers and staffers have worked from home, with only in-person notary being conducted in the office until the state Supreme Court implemented remote notarization in late March.
Currently, all lawyers and staffers use firm-purchased laptops and work via VPN or Citrix, Arndt said.
To be sure, in some of Ballard Spahr's offices in 15 U.S. cities, roughly 10 lawyers can now volunteer to return back to the office, Arndt explained. Before they are allowed into the building, the lawyer must submit a health form, provide their temperature and not have any COVID-19 symptoms.
During the height of the pandemic, firms in nearby states that hadn't enacted stay-at-home mandates were also embracing remote working, Arndt noted.
"The smaller firms I heard from sent their staff home, but the attorneys came in on a limited basis. In particular, in Nebraska I know they follow social distancing and some of the larger firms worked remotely," she said. "Firms took a cautious approach. Our industry is a service industry and can mostly provide those services remotely, at least most [of them]."
Michael Gehret, of Armstrong Teasdale's newly launched Salt Lake City office, said most attorneys in the area are also still working from home, because Utah counties issued strongly recommended social-distancing guidance.
With regards to the lawyers who are venturing back into the office, Gehret said they usually fall into two camps: They need a quiet place to work or they are "vigilantes" that felt COVID-19 wasn't "real and felt like social distancing, and the stay-at-home mandates [were] completely an overreaction and would go into the office as a protest," he said.
Kaysville, Utah-based solo practitioner Brent Burningham said his already remote firm wasn't disrupted much during the COVID-19 pandemic. While depositions have moved to video conference platforms, clients are still comfortable talking over the phone or in-person at a co-working space, he noted.
When asked if he felt less comfortable working in a co-working space during the height of a pandemic, Burningham said, "I feel more comfortable working in that space now, more than before. It's really easy to reserve a space when I need it now."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250