South Africa Poised For Sweeping New Data Laws
Lawyers say the new act will bring South Africa's laws in line with international data protection legislation, including Europe's GDPR.
June 26, 2020 at 10:09 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com International
South Africa's wide-ranging data protection and privacy act is to come into effect on Wednesday, President Cyril Ramaphosa has announced, in a move designed to bring the nation's data laws in line with the type of regulations common across the developed world.
The long awaited Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPI) will come into effect on July 1, and businesses will have 12 months to become compliant.
"The act was supposed to come into effect fully on April 1, but was postponed because of the COVID-19 crisis and the lockdown," said Ridwaan Boda, director at ENSafrica.
Some sections of POPI came into force in 2014, leading to the establishment of the Information Regulator, which took office in 2016.
Depending on how it is enforced, POPI has the potential to place South Africa on the EU regulator's white list of preapproved countries to which data can be entrusted, said Boda.
However, he said as it stands the lack of enforceable data protection legislation has never really been a deterrent to international trading and investment, because a privacy protection clause is generally built into agreements.
In line with South Africa's constitution, POPI provides that everyone has the right to privacy and strikes a balance between the right to privacy and the right of access to information.
POPI might make it easier to protect data from being acquired by nefarious means, through what is referred to as 'data colonialism', whereby data is accessed and traded as a commodity across the globe, says Boda.
"Data is a valuable tradeable commodity and has been referred to as the new oil."
The POPI act is closely related to the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) framework, according to Livia Dyer, partner at Johannesburg law firm Bowmans.
She said many organisations are already well advanced with complying with the anticipated POPI requirements, especially banks, insurance companies, retailers and others that store a lot of customer data.
"But they still have a lot of work to do, and there has not been much guidance from the regulator on what they should be doing," she said.
"Non-compliance with POPI will be subject to a fine of up to R10-million or a 10-year jail sentence."
Kelly Hutchesson, senior associate at Eversheds Sutherland said without data protection legislation South Africans have been powerless to do anything when their privacy is violated.
"Data is a valuable commodity, and direct marketing is creating money for a lot of people and often targets those who are most vulnerable."
She said the enforcement of the POPI act is likely to influence countries in the rest of Africa to follow South Africa's lead and adopt their own data privacy and protection laws.
"South Africa has learned valuable lessons from the EU in this regard, and other African countries are likely to look to us for guidance on how to implement such first-world laws."
However, she said, the question is whether it will suit African governments to bring in privacy legislation when they now have free access to any data within their respective countries.
The development is the latest example of nations across the Middle East and Africa bringing their data laws more closely in line with the GDPR.
Earlier this month, the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority introduced new data protection legislation designed to align the area's data laws with those in Europe, particularly the GDPR.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 2Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 3Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
- 4In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
- 5A Simple 'Trial Lawyer' Goes to the Supreme Court
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250