US-Based Legal Tech Companies Could Face Skills Shortage After Work Visa Bans
President Donald Trump's recent temporary suspension of H-1B and L-1 visas could cause more legal tech companies to hire out of the U.S. and leverage immigrant employees working remotely from less-restrictive jurisdictions.
June 29, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Immigration was a hallmark of President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign. And five months before the 2020 presidential election, his administration has again brought it front and center after temporarily suspending H-1B and other work visas.
Echoing the broader tech market, some U.S.-based legal tech companies say these suspensions will impact their hiring by making it harder for them to find people with the right skill sets.
"The same talent Google needs is the same talent we need, there's no difference," said iManage CEO Neil Araujo. "Our volume is probably smaller, but it's the same skill sets that we are competing for."
Araujo added, "The one difference for legal tech is legal tech is more competitive globally. There are tech companies we compete with in Europe, Australia and Canada, and ultimately our future growth and our ability to grow jobs depends on our ability to be competitive. And having the right workforce certainly impacts legal tech like any other tech company."
While Trump's executive order temporarily suspends the issuing of H-1B, H-2B, H-4, J and L visas until at least the end of this year, the New York Times reported the temporary suspensions won't be felt immediately because U.S. consulates aren't conducting interviews for most visas due to COVID-19.
Still, Jessica Demuth, legal solutions vice president at Exigent Group, which drafts visas for law firms and other legal outsourcing and tech services, argued that pausing visas won't stop the demand for certain skill sets. "What it will do in the long term is reduce production in the U.S. because they won't be able to find the skills," she said.
What's more, Demuth noted that while the U.S. is reeling from record unemployment, that doesn't mean the recently unemployed will have the skills tech companies need.
The suspension, especially if extended, may also push companies with offices outside the U.S. to consider hiring employees in less restrictive jurisdictions.
"It will get us to rethink some of our strategy," Araujo said. "We have operations in Belfast [and] Sydney, and we may choose to grow one of those centers and not the Chicago center [so] we can tap into a broader job pool that way."
But as COVID-19 keeps most out of the office, including legal tech companies, remote working could alleviate some of the impact from the visa suspensions, said Joyce Thorne, Elevate Services' human resources and learning and development vice president.
If a company organizes its staff to have the needed skills and abilities available on various shifts and time zones, the company shouldn't be severely impacted by visa suspensions, Thorne said.
"Trying to cover the U.S. from Europe when you have to get into an office at noon and are done at 9 o'clock at night, that's difficult [for employees]," she said. "We've found people to be more flexible when working remotely."
Still, Araujo said the visa orders, including the temporary suspension of L-1 visas, which allows for transfers within companies and organizations to send employees to the U.S. to establish a company office, throws companies an unnecessary curveball.
L-1 visas give "us the ability to cross-pollinate the culture and develop deeper relationships with an employee as well as execute faster when a team may be there and a contributor is in another office," Araujo added.
Still, while hiring non-U.S. citizens in the U.S. is now more difficult, some Canada-based legal tech companies see it as their potential gain.
"This has a positive impact on us, because we're primarily doing our hiring in Canada," said Noah Waisberg, CEO of Toronto-based contract review platform Kira Inc. "If anything, this restriction should encourage more talent, in particular, with people with hard-to-find skills to consider moving to Canada to work with us."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
- 2Divided State Supreme Court Clears the Way for Child Sexual Abuse Cases Against Church, Schools
- 3From Hospital Bed to Legal Insights: Lessons in Life, Law, and Lawyering
- 4‘Diminishing Returns’: Is the Superstar Supreme Court Lawyer Overvalued?
- 5LinkedIn Accused of Sharing LinkedIn Learning Video Data With Meta
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250