US-Based Legal Tech Companies Could Face Skills Shortage After Work Visa Bans
President Donald Trump's recent temporary suspension of H-1B and L-1 visas could cause more legal tech companies to hire out of the U.S. and leverage immigrant employees working remotely from less-restrictive jurisdictions.
June 29, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Immigration was a hallmark of President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign. And five months before the 2020 presidential election, his administration has again brought it front and center after temporarily suspending H-1B and other work visas.
Echoing the broader tech market, some U.S.-based legal tech companies say these suspensions will impact their hiring by making it harder for them to find people with the right skill sets.
"The same talent Google needs is the same talent we need, there's no difference," said iManage CEO Neil Araujo. "Our volume is probably smaller, but it's the same skill sets that we are competing for."
Araujo added, "The one difference for legal tech is legal tech is more competitive globally. There are tech companies we compete with in Europe, Australia and Canada, and ultimately our future growth and our ability to grow jobs depends on our ability to be competitive. And having the right workforce certainly impacts legal tech like any other tech company."
While Trump's executive order temporarily suspends the issuing of H-1B, H-2B, H-4, J and L visas until at least the end of this year, the New York Times reported the temporary suspensions won't be felt immediately because U.S. consulates aren't conducting interviews for most visas due to COVID-19.
Still, Jessica Demuth, legal solutions vice president at Exigent Group, which drafts visas for law firms and other legal outsourcing and tech services, argued that pausing visas won't stop the demand for certain skill sets. "What it will do in the long term is reduce production in the U.S. because they won't be able to find the skills," she said.
What's more, Demuth noted that while the U.S. is reeling from record unemployment, that doesn't mean the recently unemployed will have the skills tech companies need.
The suspension, especially if extended, may also push companies with offices outside the U.S. to consider hiring employees in less restrictive jurisdictions.
"It will get us to rethink some of our strategy," Araujo said. "We have operations in Belfast [and] Sydney, and we may choose to grow one of those centers and not the Chicago center [so] we can tap into a broader job pool that way."
But as COVID-19 keeps most out of the office, including legal tech companies, remote working could alleviate some of the impact from the visa suspensions, said Joyce Thorne, Elevate Services' human resources and learning and development vice president.
If a company organizes its staff to have the needed skills and abilities available on various shifts and time zones, the company shouldn't be severely impacted by visa suspensions, Thorne said.
"Trying to cover the U.S. from Europe when you have to get into an office at noon and are done at 9 o'clock at night, that's difficult [for employees]," she said. "We've found people to be more flexible when working remotely."
Still, Araujo said the visa orders, including the temporary suspension of L-1 visas, which allows for transfers within companies and organizations to send employees to the U.S. to establish a company office, throws companies an unnecessary curveball.
L-1 visas give "us the ability to cross-pollinate the culture and develop deeper relationships with an employee as well as execute faster when a team may be there and a contributor is in another office," Araujo added.
Still, while hiring non-U.S. citizens in the U.S. is now more difficult, some Canada-based legal tech companies see it as their potential gain.
"This has a positive impact on us, because we're primarily doing our hiring in Canada," said Noah Waisberg, CEO of Toronto-based contract review platform Kira Inc. "If anything, this restriction should encourage more talent, in particular, with people with hard-to-find skills to consider moving to Canada to work with us."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 2Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 3Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
- 4To Avoid Conflict, NYAG Hands Probe Into Inmate's Beating Death to Syracuse-Area DA
- 5Scripture-Quoting Employee Sues Company for Supporting LGBTQ Pride
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250