Inside the Tech Helping Lawyers Combat Labor Abuse, Human Trafficking
Certain technology is becoming essential to corporations looking to avoid reputational and regulatory risk, and prosecutors aiming to track evidence of human trafficking online.
July 01, 2020 at 12:00 PM
3 minute read
To match the growing scale of exploitation, plaintiff attorneys and in-house attorneys are leveraging tech-based solutions to track and combat labor abuse and human trafficking.
"If you're building a [human exploitation] response at the company, police department or federal level you have to take into account technology," said Radu Cucos, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) associate officer on combating trafficking in human beings and author of a recent OSCE report analyzing technology for fighting human trafficking.
As civil litigation against sex traffickers increases, as reported by Legaltech News affiliate The Legal Intelligencer, more plaintiffs attorneys are utilizing digital forensics tech in those matters.
"We generally hire a company or investigator to do a cellphone dump where they take the client's cellphone and extract all the information. [That] usually verifies what has happened to [the victim]," said Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll associate and former State Attorney's Office for Palm Beach County Special Victims Unit chief Takisha Richardson.
Generally, photographs and advertisements proving trauma and exploitation are found in personal cellphones, Richardson explained. After the criminal case is closed, civil attorneys can also obtain most of the information the prosecution had through a Freedom of Information Act request, she added.
Cucos also noted lawyers can leverage facial recognition tools, such as Traffic Jam or TellFinder, to gather more evidence of what websites victims were advertised on and perhaps prove trauma was prolonged by the stigma of being displayed on multiple websites.
Still, "These tools aren't primarily for lawyers, they are primarily for law enforcement investigations," he said. "But if lawyers want to gather more evidence and show the volume of exploitation they can think of probably using the tech tools."
As exploitation shifts onto online platforms, corporations also can't ignore the issue. Cucos noted the U.S., France, U.K. and the Netherlands have recently strengthened their supply chain laws holding companies accountable if their products or services are developed through labor exploitation.
To avoid reputational risks and disruptions to their supply chain, companies are using technology to survey their suppliers. Some companies, for example, use blockchain apps to prevent migrant workers from being exploited. Companies are now tracking workers' contracts by uploading them to a blockchain so they cannot be modified, Cucos explained.
Cucos' report noted Coca-Cola Co. is working with nonprofit Blockchain Trust Accelerator to use a blockchain to validate workers' contracts and review how labor agents are interacting with workers.
Tech tools to combat labor exploitation are also being developed in the public sector, too. The U.S. Department of Labor developed an app called "Sweat and Toil" that provides reports on child labor laws in various countries downloadable to iPhones or Androids, Cucos noted.
Free and for-profit software is available to help corporations manage their supply chains and avoid labor exploitation, but Cucos wasn't sure how involved lawyers are in implementing these corporate tools. However, he noted understanding the risk of collecting workers' data and complying to requirements would likely include legal counsel.
" I'm sure lawyers are involved in this. When you speak about supply chain tech there's a lot of discussion about data privacy. You have to make sure this data is processed by protecting privacy, in an ethical way and that there's no breaches."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1NJ Firm Narrowly Avoids Case Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Fed Court
- 2Arbitrators Under Fire for Allegedly Forcing Workers to 'Stay or Pay' Employers
- 3Plaintiff Narrowly Avoids Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Federal Court
- 4Goodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
- 5Looking to the Future of the FDA and Its Impact on Drug Regulation in 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250