Comprehensive, Remote and Growth Potential: What Investors Look for in Today's Legal Tech
Economic uncertainty has chilled investors' activity, but many are still betting on legal tech that strengthens remote working and consolidates workflows and products.
July 29, 2020 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
While the coronavirus has accelerated tech usage, it has also stoked economic uncertainty and more selective investments. These days, investors are eyeing legal tech that strengthens remote working processes and provides end-to-end support for enterprises and consumers.
"Anything that can support remote working I think is obviously well-positioned given where we are. But not just in the short term," said Dan Jansen, CEO and managing director of Dentons-backed venture investor Nextlaw Ventures.
He explained a long-term hybrid model of working remotely and in the office means "having a good contract-management system is critical. You can't go down the hall and open the filing cabinet, you have to access it remotely."
Still, while optimistic about the midterm and "very bullish" on the long-term prospects of legal tech, Jansen echoed the sentiments of legal tech investors in March, who told Legaltech News they were cautious about investing during economic uncertainty. Still, Jansen said it's difficult to pinpoint when COVID-19′s adverse economic impact will end.
"We are very bullish on legal tech, [but] on the short term it's harder because there's a great deal of uncertainty in the market," Jansen said. That uncertainty has fueled fewer investments in early stage legal tech companies, he added.
Ajay Agrawal, co-founder and CEO of contract life cycle management tech provider SirionLabs, noted investments haven't dried up, but investors are now more discerning.
"The money has not gone away but it's now chasing a few that are considered high-growth products in high-growth areas," Agrawal said. He said he's seen firsthand the legal market's growing enthusiasm for contract software and investors accompanying interest.
"CLM seems to be coming out of its shell and connecting with other business operations," he said. "That's led to the growth in investors and spurring the emergence. It's also led to the growth of contract analytics; Seal was acquired earlier this year by Docusign. Those are the two industries that are hot now."
Indeed, Agrawal's SirionLabs was one legal tech company of a few to secure outside investment in mid-2020 despite a U.S. recession. In May, SirionLabs announced it raised $44 million during a Series C round for its AI-powered contract life cycle management platform. Agrawal argued COVID-19 intensified corporate legal departments' need to efficiently review and gain insights from their contracts.
"In a pre-COVID world there was a need to understand what was in their contracts and their risks, but the COVID realities have only accelerated that trend," he said. Soon, more contract managers will provide post-signature features to further its reach beyond a corporation's legal department, Agrawal noted.
While corporate legal departments will leverage more legal tech, there will also be a demand for a one-stop-shop platform, Jansen noted.
"The average corporate legal department can't work with 30 or 50 legal tech [solutions]," he said. "Someone will become the legal tech platform where you can find all these different solutions on one platform. … I think there's a lot of money that will pour into those platforms like Clio and Elevate that are trying to become that legal tech platform."
While focused primarily on enterprise legal tech, Jansen said he was also optimistic about LegalZoom.com Inc. and other similar consumer-centric legal service providers. Noting the continued lack of access to legal representation in the United States and the predicted eviction uptick caused by COVID-19, "there's going to be a lot of need from the consumer-side legal tech," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250