The Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) is perhaps one of the most far-reaching of data privacy guardrails in the plaintiffs bar’s back pockets—and with a recent verdict, it is set to become more formidable than ever.

On Feb. 17, the Illinois Supreme Court significantly expanded the scope of BIPA in Latrina Cothron v. White Castle System by ruling that a separate claim can arise for damages every time a business collects biometric data from workers or consumers without their explicit permission. While the statute itself doesn’t specify the terms of such claim accrual, White Castle argued that damages should only be paid for the initial unlawful scan. But in a split decision, the court held that White Castle could be liable to pay record-setting damages up to $17 billion accrued with every repeating claim.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]