The 19th Century Called–It Wants its Law School Curriculum Back
Law firms need to start focusing on teaching skills in addition to offering doctrinal courses if they want to prepare lawyers for the future.
March 08, 2023 at 09:15 AM
5 minute read
In 1871, Christopher Columbus Langdell, Dean at Harvard Law School, published the first textbook of cases, introducing a pedagogy that continues in law schools around the world to this day. More than 150 years later, we continue teasing out principles from the case method of teaching as a rite of passage. For Langdell and the subsequent legions of law professors, it was caselaw Über Alles. For generations, they have believed that students can best understand the evolution of the law by reading cases rather than by studying isolated doctrine out of context. It surely is an effective way to learn the law if you are going to go clerk for a judge or be a judge.
But softer skills like cultural competencies, drafting, fact-finding, and problem identification—those that are practical for the classroom and the workplace—are relegated to the sidelines. It has only been a few decades since legal skills—deemed as not academically serious enough to earn some law professors tenure or equal pay with colleagues who teach so-called doctrinal courses—have even been integrated into the legal curriculum. Given that most civil cases settle, and most criminal cases get plea bargained, it seems a mismatch that very few law students study mediation and negotiation, key skills they will need in their future careers.
It is no surprise then the legal academy should be so resistant to offering (or only tentatively offering) courses on computational law and artificial intelligence (AI), disruptive technologies that can have a profound impact on legal practice in the future. But law schools will fail their students if they do not prepare them for the coming Law 4.0 era. While anchoring the practice of law to fundamental principles of justice, Law 4.0 navigates new innovations and mandates reform in the practice of law and in the classroom. Law 4.0 requires our lawyers to be digitally fluent and tech-savvy. They should be ready to defend their clients' best interests in both the physical and virtual worlds. The legal sector should enable access to justice through technology while maintaining ethical standards and exercising professional responsibility.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250