How to Stay on Top of Cybersecurity Disclosures as SEC Ramps Up Enforcement
It is critical companies take stock of their cyber hygiene policies and incident response protocols, and not only manage cybersecurity risks and prevent attacks, but also respond to them with proper disclosures.
May 04, 2023 at 06:01 PM
8 minute read
It is no secret among public companies and their counsel that the US Securities and Exchange Commission has steadily adopted a more aggressive stance on cybersecurity controls and disclosure and incident response recordkeeping. SEC Senior Counsel Arsen Ablaev recently highlighted the Commission's cybersecurity priorities at the annual Incident Response Forum Masterclass. SEC Chair Gary Gensler also emphasized risks in cyber and information security in the March 29 budget hearing with the House Appropriations Committee, and endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden's request to earmark a record $2.4 billion in funding for the regulator in 2024. Last month saw yet another example of the SEC's mounting focus on cyber disclosures as an enforcement priority with the announcement that cloud computing company Blackbaud agreed to pay a $3-million civil penalty to settle administrative charges for alleged "materially misleading disclosures" about a 2020 ransomware attack.
As we foreshadowed in our 2023 U.S. Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Outlook and Review, the increase in SEC enforcement resources (e.g., doubling the size of its Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit Ablaev sits in), in combination with the promulgation of cybersecurity risk management, strategy, governance, and incident disclosure rules Ablaev confirmed will be finalized in coming months, signal that cybersecurity will continue to be an area of heightened enforcement activity for the SEC. In light of these developments, it is critical companies take stock of their cyber hygiene policies and incident response protocols, and not only manage cybersecurity risks and prevent attacks, but also respond to them with proper disclosures.
|Ablaev at Incident Response Forum: SEC's Priorities and Blackbaud as a Masterclass In What Not To Do
While speaking in his personal capacity at the Incident Response Forum Masterclass on April 20, 2023, Ablaev touched on the SEC's cyber-enforcement priorities with respect to issuers. Referencing the rules that will soon be finalized, Ablaev said the SEC's priorities can be divided into three categories:
|- Flow of information: both internal information flow from CISOs (chief information security officers) up to the company's senior brass and board, as well as external information flow to investors;
- More involvement and oversight by senior management, executives, and in some cases, company board, in risk management, cybersecurity hygiene, and incident response; and
- More robust documentation and recordkeeping related to breaches and incident response, including transparent and ongoing disclosures of material cyber incidents.
On issuers' concern of disclosing information mid-breach, particularly if the vulnerability is yet to be resolved and intelligence about the incident drastically changes day to day, Ablaev said that is less of an issue today compared to five years ago.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250