Some of the commentary around current significant developments in AI and machine learning misses a salient fact: laws already made, whether permissive or prohibitive, still apply. There is a danger that hype, and misconception, will lead to overly restrictive regulation that has a strangulating effect on research and innovation.
There are two main bodies of thought in the explosion of commentary since ChatGPT wrote its first sentence: one, mainly positive on the possibilities to which this new-fangled software could be put, and a second, broadly negative, which ranges from the “our jobs are gone” type speculation to the doomsday, apocalyptic wing of the commentariat.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
