If you believe the hype, ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) are having a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day. Why? The Southern District of New York issued sanctions in the first-ever ChatGPT matter. But, as with anything trending in a media firestorm, the hype misses the forest for the trees for ChatGPT.

While many hailed this case as an example of everything wrong with Open AI’s ChatGPT, that misses the bigger implications. The hallucinating havoc of this case serves as a cautionary tale for humans more than for the technology, highlighting the need for due diligence and upholding the ethical duties of technical competence and oversight.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]