With generative artificial intelligence, the time it takes to perform routine legal assignments can be cut down by as much as 32% without sacrificing quality, a recent study suggests. But when it comes to the impact of generative AI on the quality of the work produced, results depended on the skill level of participants and the legal task at hand.

These insights come from a trio of professors at the University of Southern California and University of Minnesota, aiming to evaluate the effect of GPT-4 assistance on quality and efficiency on four tasks that many junior lawyers encounter in the early years of their careers.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]