The Right Data Strategy Can Help Your AI Plan Succeed: A Guide for In-House Legal Teams
Before exploring its role in powering the effective use of gen AI tools, it is critical to understand what a "data strategy" entails in a corporate legal setting. In general, a data strategy is a comprehensive plan that outlines how an organization collects, stores, manages, shares, and uses data.
August 26, 2024 at 11:45 AM
9 minute read
Introduction
Generative AI (gen AI) has ushered in a wave of significant transformations across a range of business functions, including corporate legal functions. This innovative technology has the potential to transform legal departments and enhance efficiency across a spectrum of tasks, such as analyzing data, researching legal issues, summarizing documents, and comparing information. Legal organizations are attempting to embrace these new tools. However, they frequently fail to consider a key component needed for success: a robust data strategy.
What Is a 'Data Strategy'?
Before exploring its role in powering the effective use of gen AI tools, it is critical to understand what a "data strategy" entails in a corporate legal setting. In general, a data strategy is a comprehensive plan that outlines how an organization collects, stores, manages, shares, and uses data. It is a roadmap that aligns the organization's data initiatives with its strategic business goals. A robust data strategy addresses issues including data governance, data quality, data architecture, and data literacy, helping to ensure that enterprise data are treated as assets that can drive decision-making and innovation. Finally, a foundational component of a data strategy is a blueprint that provides tactical insights into the systems where data resides, the interconnectivity of those systems, and the data stored there, as well as the business questions/considerations that each system (and its associated data) is intended to address. In the context of a corporate legal function, this will typically influence how department resources are capturing and storing information related to legal matters, contracting, and law department knowledge.
The Role of a Defined Data Strategy in the Successful Implementation of Gen AI
Generative AI, a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), uses machine learning models to create, review, and analyze content including text, images, and even software code based on user input and the data it can access. As an example, in the context of corporate legal functions, gen AI can be leveraged or trained to support the following use cases:
- Review contract templates to help identify deviations in third-party paper and generate responsive positions that the legal team has pre-approved.
- Organize and manage the vast amount of knowledge within a legal department. It can help in categorizing, searching, and retrieving information quickly and efficiently.
- Analyze historical case history to generate strategic insights, aiding in the creation of tailored legal content to enhance a company's negotiations and litigation strategy and results.
- Streamline the process of reviewing legal invoices. It can analyze line items, compare them against agreed-upon rates and rules, identify billing errors or discrepancies, and help ensure compliance with the company's billing guidelines.
However, the quality and accuracy of the output heavily relies on the quality and depth of the underlying data available to the AI tool.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Relaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
- 2Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 3With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 4Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 5Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250