Priori Launches New RFP Software, Priori RFP
Following a six month trial period, the outside counsel hiring company is rolling out the Request for Proposal (RFP) software to its international user base.
November 12, 2024 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Legal TechnologyPriori, an outside counsel selection and management company, announced Tuesday the release of Priori RFP, a new product designed to streamline the Request for Proposal (RFP) process for corporate legal departments.
Founded in 2013 by Basha Rubin and Mirra Levitt, who respectively serve as the company’s CEO and Chief Product Officer, Priori started with an outside counsel marketplace, before launching Priori Panel Management (previously known as Scout) in 2022. The new RFP product is intended to fill the gap between identifying external counsel and managing the relationship between legal departments and their law firms.
The release follows a successful trial period as part of Priori’s Feature Lab, which incorporated an earlier version of the RFP Software, as well as review and scorecard features, in a free six month early access program.
What It Is: Priori RFP is a software solution for creating RFPs, evaluating bids, tracking performance, and communicating with outside counsel. The software will come with both ready-made and customizable templates for RFPs, tools for comparing bids and measuring the performance of successful bidders, and collaboration functions.
Rubin told Legaltech News that the software will satisfy customer demands to “be able to compare [firms] side by side on one platform, and then also creat[e] feedback loops with their panel.”
Legal departments can select firms they have previously worked with to receive an outgoing RFP, as well as identify firms they have not worked with that they would like to query.
“If they just want to use their existing network, they can pull from all that panel management data … about the suppliers they’re already working with,” Levitt said. “If they want to reach out to other firms that they’ve never worked with, they can add those in as well … Finally, to the extent they say ‘I don’t know the name of the firm that I want, but I want a certain kind of new relationship,’ they can also reach out to Priori’s marketplace and we can search from there.”
Why It’s Needed: Rubin told Legaltech News that the new software “completes the full life cycle of finding the right lawyer at the right price.” While identifying, hiring, and managing outside counsel have largely been separate processes, Priori hopes to bring them all under one roof.
Integrating the RFP process with the management of outside counsel relationships will also serve to make both processes more efficient, Levitt told Legaltech News. “There’s a lot of data feedback loops that people can leverage here. And to the extent they’re building that sort of data about their existing set of suppliers in panel management, or pulling in way more data there to inform the RFP process and make it more efficient.”
While corporate legal departments have been slow to adopt new RFP tools, and have at times been reluctant to engage in a RFP process at all, the competitive bidding represents a potential cost savings for legal work.
The Competition: A variety of other legal tech companies serve various aspects of the outside counsel selection and management process. Leopard Solutions recently unveiled Leopard Prowess, a platform for corporations looking to engage law firms, while outside counsel management platform Persuit offers RFP creation and evaluation tools as well. Recent years have also seen a profusion of RFP response platforms, including Loopio, Responsive, and ikaun.
Priori’s leadership believes that the comprehensiveness of its offerings and the strength of its talent marketplace set the company apart.
“Linking all three of them, the panel management, the talent marketplace, and the RFP, we’re really a single source for all outside counsel hiring,” said Rubin.She called Priori “ a single source solution for them to make sure they’re hiring the right lawyer and then understanding the performance of that lawyer over time so they can make better decisions.”
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 2The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 3Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 4Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 5Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250