Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
One area that has not received as much attention as others, however, is the risk involved in business users’ use of gen AI to query data stored in databases.
January 15, 2025 at 10:01 AM
6 minute read
Generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) systems that leverage large language models (LLMs) are proliferating faster than even the most ardent tech enthusiasts had envisioned. Many legal professionals are captivated by this technology and are busy analyzing and discussing the benefits, risks and impacts of gen AI to both the business and the practice of law. Much attention has been dedicated to the use of gen AI for document summarization, categorization, search, and first-draft generation. Almost every practice area is busy assessing the impact of this technology on their respective fields, including the areas of e-discovery and information governance. One area that has not received as much attention as others, however, is the risk involved in business users’ use of gen AI to query data stored in databases.
Harnessing Data in Corporate Database Reporting
Databases serve as the backbone of modern business, allowing organizations to keep pace with the storage, management and analysis of an ever-growing amount of data. While scaling to meet storage needs of the future, these systems also offer data integrity, fast retrieval, scalability, security, and analytics. But these advantages require specialized knowledge to appropriately query the stored content—specialized knowledge that is typically the provenance of database administrators (DBAs), data engineers, and other power users. For example, the most widely used type of database—relational databases—require knowledge of structured query language (SQL) to access the contents stored within them.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1'If the Job Is Better, You Get Better': Chief District Judge Discusses Overcoming Negative Perceptions During Q&A
- 2Nondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
- 3Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
- 4Lessons From Five Popular Change Management Concepts: A Guide for Law Firm Leaders in 2025
- 5People in the News—Jan. 15, 2025—Ballard Spahr, Brahin Law
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250