There has been an array of stories emanating from the nation’s courtrooms about jurors causing havoc — and often mistrials — by using electronic devices to research issues pertaining to their cases or post information about deliberations on networking sites.
And now, just this month, comes word of a similar case in Connecticut. Given the growing trend, some Connecticut judges have taken it upon themselves to expand the warnings that they give to jurors. Others aren’t convinced quite yet that’s necessary.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
