Trial exhibits have played an important role in American litigation, and trials involving O.J. Simpson have been no exception. “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit,” argued the late Johnnie Cochran, waving a bloody glove in Simpson’s infamous 1995 murder trial.
Prosecutors were scorned for mediocre strategies in that case, but when Orenthal James Simpson faced a jury last year in Las Vegas, charged with kidnapping and robbery, Simpson’s Nevada prosecutors turned to state-of-the-art legal technology to help make their case. State v. Simpson, No. C237890 (Dist. Ct. Clark Co., Nev.).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
