It is not, of course, that we don’t have a fair amount of technology-augmented trial practice. Anecdotal evidence abounds as to both quantity and, sometimes, quality. In recent study of the United States district courts, the Federal Judicial Center, conducted by Elizabeth Wiggins, Meghan Dunn and George Cort, respondents reported that 98% of districts have access to an evidence camera and 93% to wiring to connect laptop computer.
Yet, the installed technology base is smaller than one might assume. Of respondents, only 21% of courtrooms have an evidence camera permanently installed, and 27% have wiring to connect laptop computers. (Federal Judicial Center Survey on Courtroom Technology 8 Sept. 8, 2003 draft edition).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
