So did a sadness, recognizing that most resumé falsifications are unnecessary, add little to one’s candidacy, and once engaged in, have a history that lives long after the candidate has revised the resumé.
Let me explain — and yes, gentle reader — this is where the technology slant comes in. It used to be that those who evaluate resumés kept the paper copy of a candidate’s resumé for a finite period of time. Sometimes it got pitched after five years, sometimes it went to a remote warehouse, not to be seen unless subpoenaed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]