Judge Shira Scheindlin of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has a basic rule for estimating the cost to discover electronic records in any given trial. “A court should always be skeptical at the first dollar amount thrown out by either party,” she says. “I ask the requesting party to explain their estimate, and then consult the producing party or a court-appointed neutral party until a figure can be agreed on. It almost always seems to be a figure right in the middle between what the two parties initially give.”

Six years ago, Judge Scheindlin wrote a series of five separate rulings in Zubulake v. UBS Warburg, discussing in great detail how to best manage or share the burden of discovery for electronic records. Much of that ruling has been codified in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and also incorporated into rules for non-federal jurisdictions. But the problems associated with the cost of e-discovery continues to dog litigators and judges, despite new case law, updated rules, and technology designed specifically to address the issue.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]