The Supreme Court ruled Microsoft must pay a $290 million judgment to a small Canadian software company for infringing on one of its patents inside Microsoft Word. The software giant said a jury should determine whether a patent is invalid by a "preponderance" of the evidence. The Supreme Court ruled the "clear and convincing" standard instructed by the judge was the correct one.
June 10, 2011 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The Supreme Court ruled (PDF) Thursday that Microsoft must pay a $290 million judgment awarded to a small Canadian software company for infringing on one of its patents inside its popular Microsoft Word program.
The high court unanimously refused to throw out the judgment against the world’s largest software maker.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for a Real Estate Litigation Associate with three to six years of commerci...
Downtown NY property and casualty defense law firm seeks a Litigation Associate with 3+ years' experience to become a part of our team! You ...
