In February, Above the Law declared predictive coding its “legal technology buzzword of 2011.” More recently, as covered on EDD Update, the buzz became a deafening roar as one e-discovery provider, Recommind, announced a patent for its “predictive coding” technology. Understandably, other providers offering what they believed to be “predictive coding” tools were quite miffed and the notion of patenting predictive coding remains hotly debated.
Let’s take a deeper dive into what “predictive coding” really means, explore some of its purported benefits, and delve into the biggest question for many practitioners and litigants: Is it reasonable and therefore defensible to use?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
