For more than a decade, the legal community has struggled to effectively use technology to find “smoking guns” during document review in electronic data discovery — while containing the costs of that technology (and the humans who must manage it). It’s not an easy mission. Everything from creating nuanced keywords to hiring the right reviewers can make or break a case. And technology can get expensive, fast; there’s no point in spending $500,000 to review files on a case with an exposure of $100,000.
In our October issue of Law Technology News, U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck helps us understand the challenges of beginning the electronic data discovery process in a case. In “Search, Forward” New York-based Peck provides context with a look at the development of today’s options.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
